2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2004.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors for 2-year outcome of major depressive episode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
31
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…16,21,33 In the present study, the sociodemographic domain did not result in statistically significant predictive variables (i.e., age, sex, marital status, and level of education). Some studies, however, identified age as a predictor of slower response to treatment, 7,26 while others found no association between age and treatment outcome. 7,8 Level of education may be positively associated with treatment outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…16,21,33 In the present study, the sociodemographic domain did not result in statistically significant predictive variables (i.e., age, sex, marital status, and level of education). Some studies, however, identified age as a predictor of slower response to treatment, 7,26 while others found no association between age and treatment outcome. 7,8 Level of education may be positively associated with treatment outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies, however, identified age as a predictor of slower response to treatment, 7,26 while others found no association between age and treatment outcome. 7,8 Level of education may be positively associated with treatment outcome. 9 Other examples of potential demographic predictors of treatment outcome include gender, marital Figure 1 Linear slope estimates for the LNS Â Treatment interaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After providing patients with a complete description of the study, written informed consent was obtained from each of them. The Hungarian version of Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I and Axis II disorders (SCID-I-II) (Szádóczky et al 2004(Szádóczky et al , 2006 was then administered to confirm the diagnosis of BPD and to assess comorbid disorders. Twelve of ninety-two participants were eliminated by the diagnostic interview: eight because they were found to have disorders excluded from this study, as above, and four, because they met less than five BPD diagnostic criteria.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Searching for predictive factors influencing the outcome of a 2-year prospective antidepressant follow-up study, Szadoczky et al [11] found that a high level of trait anxiety predicted a high level of depressive symptoms at the end of the study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%