2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40121-020-00354-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors and Outcomes of Hospitalization for Influenza: Real-World Evidence from the United States Medicare Population

Abstract: Introduction: The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of initial hospitalization and describe the outcomes of high-risk patients hospitalized with influenza. Methods: Data were taken from the 5% national US Medicare database from 2012 to 2015. Patients (aged at least 13 years) were required to have at least one diagnosis for influenza and have continuous health plan enrollment for 6 months before (baseline) and 3 months (follow-up) after the date of influenza diagnosis. Patients who died during fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4,5 All-cause and disease-specific mortality prediction in research and clinical practice has included underlying conditions or "baseline mortality risk", often derived and validated using EHR. [6][7][8] Underlying non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are important mortality predictors in infectious diseases [9][10] , but baseline mortality risk based on NCDs is largely neglected in pandemic preparedness, which emphasises infection transmissibility and severity, using metrics such as case fatality ratio, infection fatality ratio and reproduction number. [11][12][13][14] Although COVID-19 is increasingly viewed as a "syndemic" 15 (with interaction between infectious diseases and NCDs, requiring cross-speciality expertise), efforts to predict excess mortality have focused on dynamic transmission modelling without consideration of baseline risk or use of anonymised, individual-level, population-scale EHR 16,17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 All-cause and disease-specific mortality prediction in research and clinical practice has included underlying conditions or "baseline mortality risk", often derived and validated using EHR. [6][7][8] Underlying non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are important mortality predictors in infectious diseases [9][10] , but baseline mortality risk based on NCDs is largely neglected in pandemic preparedness, which emphasises infection transmissibility and severity, using metrics such as case fatality ratio, infection fatality ratio and reproduction number. [11][12][13][14] Although COVID-19 is increasingly viewed as a "syndemic" 15 (with interaction between infectious diseases and NCDs, requiring cross-speciality expertise), efforts to predict excess mortality have focused on dynamic transmission modelling without consideration of baseline risk or use of anonymised, individual-level, population-scale EHR 16,17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%