2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.06.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors and Impact of Major Hemorrhage on Mortality Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention from the REPLACE-2 Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
196
3
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 310 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
13
196
3
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we found that women had a significantly higher rate of dissection (3.3 vs. 7.2 %, p < .003) and bleeding complication (0.4 vs. 1.5 %, p = .044) in the ICgroup. The latter was previously found in several other studies, revealing more bleeding complications for female gender when undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention [17]. This might be due to a diff erence in the pharmacokinetics of heparin in women [18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In addition, we found that women had a significantly higher rate of dissection (3.3 vs. 7.2 %, p < .003) and bleeding complication (0.4 vs. 1.5 %, p = .044) in the ICgroup. The latter was previously found in several other studies, revealing more bleeding complications for female gender when undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention [17]. This might be due to a diff erence in the pharmacokinetics of heparin in women [18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…19 Patients with renal insufficiency form a large portion of the ACS patient population, with a prevalence varying from 13.2% for patients with GFR below 30 ml/min to 42% for patients with GFR between 30 and 70 ml/min. 23,24 Furthermore, it has been shown that patients with renal failure benefit from an invasive strategy, although they are in fact at higher risk for bleeding, especially when dose restriction is not applied. 25 Patients aged 75 years and above Age above 75 years has been shown to be an independent risk factor for bleeding complications and worse outcome.…”
Section: Renal Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sin embargo, la variabilidad anatómica y de tamaño, así como la inadecuada irrigación colateral, no siempre hacen posible el acceso por esta arteria [1][2][3][4][5][6] . Desde que en el 2001 Terashima 7 reportara el uso de la arteria cubital o ulnar para diagnóstico y terapia coronaria, esta arteria se ha transformado en una alternativa en pacientes seleccionados aún cuando las características anatómicas, principalmente la cercanía con el nervio cubital y su profundidad la hacen potencialmente propensa a complicaciones diferentes a las de la arteria radial.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified