2010
DOI: 10.1080/13691181003639866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors and Consequences of Differentiated Practices on Social Network Sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
81
1
12

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
7
81
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Advertisements on Facebook have been found to have a greater effect on females than males (Hargittai and Hsieh 2010). Research has found that although internet use is not affected by gender (Fallows 2005), motivations on how time is spent whilst in this online environment signifies inherent differences.…”
Section: Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advertisements on Facebook have been found to have a greater effect on females than males (Hargittai and Hsieh 2010). Research has found that although internet use is not affected by gender (Fallows 2005), motivations on how time is spent whilst in this online environment signifies inherent differences.…”
Section: Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Así se ha abordado desde la perspectiva de las motivaciones de uso (Lin & Lu, 2011;Seidman, 2013;Tosun, 2012;Vergés, 2012;Yang & Brown, 2013), los tipos de uso (Carpenter, Green & LaFlan, 2011;Cheung, Chiu & Lee, 2010, Zillien & Hargittai, 2009), la intensidad de uso (Hargittati & Hsieh, 2010;Steinfield, Ellison & Lampe, 2008) y las habilidades de uso (Hargittai, 2010;Hsieh, 2012).…”
Section: Antecedentesunclassified
“…Furthermore, by asking students that why they did not put more effort into academic work, Yazedjan et al in 2008 have found SNSs' distraction as a regular explanation. Other researchers studying this same issue found either no-to-little relationship between the use of SNSs and student academic performance (Ahmed & Qazi, 2011;Hargittai & Hsieh, 2010;Kolek and Saunders, 2008), or actually an increase in student academic performance (Junco, Heibergert, & Loken, 2011;Pasek, More, & Hargittai, 2009;Rizzuto, LeDoux, & Hatala, 2009). Among these studies, Madge, et al in 2009 found that SNSs are mainly used to keep up with social aspects of college life and it is a part of most students' daily routine.…”
Section: Impacts Of Using Snss On Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long since, there has also been considerable discussion regarding the frequent use of different SNSs by students and the possible effect of its tools (e.g., Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, Xanga, Friendster) on students' academic performance (Connolly, 2011;Hargittai & Hsieh, 2010;Karpinski & Duberstein, 20009). Regarding academic settings, Lenhart in 2009 and later, Anderson & Rainie in 2012 have mentioned that use of internet has wide spread implications particularly for the areas of education (e.g., the identification and use of compatible teaching methods, the design and implementation of complimentary curriculum decisions, and the design of non-classroom educational assignments); communications (e.g., the identification of appropriate channels to exchange educational information among individuals); and economics (e.g., the allocation of public financial resources towards educational and social services activities, and the creation of future business opportunities) (Anderson, & Rainie, 2012;Chen, & Bryer, 2012).…”
Section: Impacts Of Using Snss On Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%