2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.12.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors Affecting In-hospital Mortality of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Greek Multicenter Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1 The development of a risk score that incorporates patients who underwent either EVAR or open AAA repair remains elusive. The endovascular approach may lead to improved survival in tertiary care centers where it is readily accessible, 9 although prospective data currently does not support this in the case of emergent rAAA repair. 10 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The development of a risk score that incorporates patients who underwent either EVAR or open AAA repair remains elusive. The endovascular approach may lead to improved survival in tertiary care centers where it is readily accessible, 9 although prospective data currently does not support this in the case of emergent rAAA repair. 10 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was validated in two studies (C‐statistic 0·710, 95 per cent c.i. 0·66 to 0·76, H‐L P = 0·01; C‐statistic 0·780, 0·740 to 0·830). Because of the paucity and continuous nature of the variables in the model, the EPV was larger than 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A recent meta-analysis of abdominal compartment syndrome after endovascular repair of rAAAs revealed that there was a significant linear correlation between hemodynamic instability and death [20]. Furthermore, in another recent study based on predictors affecting in-hospital mortality of rAAAs, it was stated that hemodynamic instability (P < 0.001) independently increased in-hospital mortality [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…21 greater than or equal to grade 2, then the patient was considered to have a hostile anatomy (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Patients With Hostile Anat Omy (N=23) Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%