2020
DOI: 10.15517/ap.v34i128.41431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictores de síntomas emocionales durante la cuarentena domiciliar por pandemia de COVID-19 en El Salvador

Abstract: Objetivo. Explorar la manifestación de síntomas emocionales y potenciales predictores en población salvadoreña bajo condiciones de cuarentena domiciliar debido a la pandemia de COVID-19. Método. Se contó con una muestra no probabilística de 339 participantes mayores de 18 años, 62% mujeres y 38% hombres, mayoritariamente dedicados a su trabajo (52.8%). Un cuestionario en línea registró acciones y percepciones sobre la situación de pandemia y síntomas emocionales (escala DASS-21). Resultados. Alrededor del 75% … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
53
0
43

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(33 reference statements)
3
53
0
43
Order By: Relevance
“…The emotional perception results indicate that a significant number of participants were experiencing emotional sequelae, although the general data show they were only moderately impacted. This could be attributed to the moment of data collection (phase 1 and phase 2), meaning that a set of expected psychological responses is involved, which coincides with the study by Wang et al (2020) during the initial phase of COVID-19 in China, El Salvador (Orellana & Orellana, 2020), and Mexico (González Ramírez, Martínez Arriaga, Hernández-Gonzalez, & De la Roca-Chiapas, 2020).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The emotional perception results indicate that a significant number of participants were experiencing emotional sequelae, although the general data show they were only moderately impacted. This could be attributed to the moment of data collection (phase 1 and phase 2), meaning that a set of expected psychological responses is involved, which coincides with the study by Wang et al (2020) during the initial phase of COVID-19 in China, El Salvador (Orellana & Orellana, 2020), and Mexico (González Ramírez, Martínez Arriaga, Hernández-Gonzalez, & De la Roca-Chiapas, 2020).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In addition to the above, due to the fact that the sampling was non-probabilistic, there could be problems regarding the sample distribution, since, in the present study, most respondents were single women, from the center of the country, and with a high educational level. However, it suffices to review the sample distribution and characteristics of the participants in current research on to see that these data are consistent in various parts of the world, with women's responses ranging from 52% to 80% (Dai et al, 2020;González Ramírez et al, 2020;Muñiz & Corduneanu, 2020;Orellana & Orellana, 2020;Shacham et al, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some studies related to university students do not report differences by gender (Cao et al, 2020), others have found more COVID-19-related anxiety in females (X. Liu et al, 2020;Orellana & Orellana, 2020) and, specifically, in those in care positions predominantly held by women. One hypotheses suggests that this is because these women are more vulnerable to contagion, and because the transfer of care to family members, at home, promotes an inequitable distribution of work by gender (Lozano & Calvente, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This has seriously affected the living conditions of their populations, and it has been especially detrimental in countries with fewer resources, such as those in the Latin American region. Certain aspects of the disease, such as the uncertainty about how it is spread, its evolution or about the immunity of patients who have been infected, or the absence of a vaccine to counter the disease, have led to an increased feeling of fear among the population ( Orellana and Orellana, 2020 ; Ornell et al, 2020 ; Rodríguez-Rey et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%