2021
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.711007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive Value of the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index for Intravenous Immunoglobulin Resistance and Cardiovascular Complications in Kawasaki Disease

Abstract: Background: The prediction of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) resistance and cardiovascular complications are critically clinical issues in Kawasaki disease (KD). This prospective study firstly aimed to determine the predictive ability of the systemic immune inflammation index (SII) for IVIG resistance and cardiovascular complications and compare the prognostic accuracy of SII with that of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR).Methods: Patients with KD were divided into … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(79 reference statements)
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, IVIG-resistant patients had a higher SII and a lower decrease in its fluctuations pre- and post-treatment than IVIG-responsive patients. Additionally, a high SII after treatment was found to be significantly associated with IVIG resistance but not CAA development, which is consistent with the results of Liu et al [ 22 ] but not of Rumeysa et al [ 19 ], possibly because of the different days of detection of illness onset. Interestingly, our study found that patients with KD had a lower PNI, which is an index for nutritional assessment, both in the IVIG-resistant and CAA groups when compared to their respective counterparts, as in several previous studies [ 15 – 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the present study, IVIG-resistant patients had a higher SII and a lower decrease in its fluctuations pre- and post-treatment than IVIG-responsive patients. Additionally, a high SII after treatment was found to be significantly associated with IVIG resistance but not CAA development, which is consistent with the results of Liu et al [ 22 ] but not of Rumeysa et al [ 19 ], possibly because of the different days of detection of illness onset. Interestingly, our study found that patients with KD had a lower PNI, which is an index for nutritional assessment, both in the IVIG-resistant and CAA groups when compared to their respective counterparts, as in several previous studies [ 15 – 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Consistent with previous findings [ 5 , 21 , 46 , 52 54 ], our results showed that IVIG-resistant patients had a significantly higher NLR both pre- and post-treatment than IVIG-responsive patients. Notably, SII, which combines the NLR and platelet counts, was proposed as an independent risk factor for IVIG resistance and several cardiovascular complications in patients with KD; however, opposite findings were reported in subgroup analyses of patients with coronary artery lesions [ 19 , 22 ]. In the present study, IVIG-resistant patients had a higher SII and a lower decrease in its fluctuations pre- and post-treatment than IVIG-responsive patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several in ammatory laboratory parameters and cytokine markers have been reported to predict IVIG-resistant KD, but they may not be popular in clinical practice because they are invasive, expensive and lack reliability [5][6][7]. Several scoring systems proposed by Japanese researchers are also commonly used in the clinical identi cation of IVIG-resistant patients [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three additional articles were identified by screening the references of the retrieved full texts during primary screening. After the final screening against eligibility criteria, 22 papers were included in this study (Figure 1) (13)(14)(15)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38).…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%