2009
DOI: 10.1185/03007990903126908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive value of the respiratory syncytial virus risk-scoring tool in the term infant in Canada

Abstract: Overall, the risk-scoring tool did not discriminate between low versus moderate- to high-risk RSV-positive term infants who require hospitalization which has cost implications, since universal prophylaxis of this cohort would be financially prohibitive. A larger study is necessary to establish risk factors that more accurately determine RSV hospitalization among term infants.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on national and provincial guidelines, 88% of the admissions to PICU in our study would not have qualified for RSV prophylaxis. Moreover, 66% of all admissions aged ≤2 years were greater than 36 weeks gestation, and currently none of the risk factors in the Canadian risk assessment tool effectively target a sub-group of patients among this cohort that would cost-effectively benefit from prophylaxis [30]. The incidence of RSV infection in those who received palivizumab prophylaxis was 3.3% and is within the range of similar reports from the scientific literature.…”
Section: Comparison Of Young and Older Children With Rsvsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Based on national and provincial guidelines, 88% of the admissions to PICU in our study would not have qualified for RSV prophylaxis. Moreover, 66% of all admissions aged ≤2 years were greater than 36 weeks gestation, and currently none of the risk factors in the Canadian risk assessment tool effectively target a sub-group of patients among this cohort that would cost-effectively benefit from prophylaxis [30]. The incidence of RSV infection in those who received palivizumab prophylaxis was 3.3% and is within the range of similar reports from the scientific literature.…”
Section: Comparison Of Young and Older Children With Rsvsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…None of the latter group was hospitalized, but 5/346 low risk group infants were hospitalized. Thus it would appear that the Canadian scoring tool identified most high risk babies for prophylaxis since the overall rate of hospitalization was 5/430 (1.2%) compared to the rate of 66/1758 (3.7%) [65] in the multicenter study of un-prophylaxed Canadian infants. Validation of the European Risk Factor Scoring Tool is being undertaken in Holland and other European countries.…”
Section: Models For Predicting Rsv In the Late Preterm Infantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Paes et al [151], the model developed in Sampalis et al [146] cannot accurately predict RSV hospitalization or ED visit for term infants. Also, the predictors of RSV hospitalization that work for preterm infants born at 33-35 weeks gestation have little or no predictive power for term infants.…”
Section: Predicting Rsv Hospitalizationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It remains an open problem to develop models to predict the true need for (complicated) seasonal RSV hospitalization for all young children, not only those born at 33-35 weeks gestation [151]. To build such predictive models, we can use the predictors of RSV/bronchiolitis hospitalization that have already been identified in the literature for young children born at various gestational stages [60-63, 66, 96, 131, 141, 144, 145, 152-159, 161-182].…”
Section: Predicting Rsv Hospitalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation