2017
DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2017.1369605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive Value of the Number of Harvested Lymph Nodes and Cut-Off for Lymph Node Ratio in the Prognosis of Stage II and III Colorectal Cancer Patients

Abstract: Stage II patients with LNS < 12 tend to have shorter DFS than stage II patients with LNS ≥ 12. In stage III patients, an appropriate LNR cut-off is a better prognostic predictor than LNR quartile, especially in patients with LNS ≥ 12.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
19
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Destri [18] found that stage II patients with ELN <12 tend to have shorter DFS than stage II patients with ELN ≥12, and in stage III patients, ELN >12 is a better prognostic factor. These studies formed the guideline threshold of the AJCC recommendation of at least 12 LNs for all CRC patients [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Destri [18] found that stage II patients with ELN <12 tend to have shorter DFS than stage II patients with ELN ≥12, and in stage III patients, ELN >12 is a better prognostic factor. These studies formed the guideline threshold of the AJCC recommendation of at least 12 LNs for all CRC patients [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient Population. Population-based data on CRC patients from the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)- 18 Program from 1988-2014 (https://seer .cancer.gov/) was extracted and evaluated, as ELN count was available since 1988. The inclusion criteria were patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma, who underwent surgical resection, a T3 or T4 tumor, tumor parameters available in the SEER-18 database, ELN numbers available, no distant metastasis, tumor-specific related death information was available.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among 1407 patients treated with NACRT and staged ypN0 (stage II), the number of lymph nodes retrieved, even when < 12, was not associated with survival and did not, therefore, have prognostic value. By contrast, among patients with metastatic lymph nodes (stage III), the LNR had a prognostic role regardless of the lymph node yield [11,31]. In our opinion, if the LNR were incorporated into the AJCC staging system [13] when the lymph node yield is < 12, the incidence of stage migration would be reduced [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Multiple studies have demonstrated an inverse relationship between the lymph node ratio (LNR; the number of positive lymph nodes divided by the total number of nodes evaluated) and disease‐free or overall survival . Berger et al showed that patients with N1 disease and a high LNR (>40%) had worse 5‐year survival than patients with N2 disease and a low LNR (<20%), demonstrating the importance of a larger denominator of lymph nodes evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berger et al showed that patients with N1 disease and a high LNR (>40%) had worse 5‐year survival than patients with N2 disease and a low LNR (<20%), demonstrating the importance of a larger denominator of lymph nodes evaluated. The prognostic power of this ratio loses its significance with less than 10 to 12 nodes evaluated, further illustrating the importance of maximizing the number of nodes assessed …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%