2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.07.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive value of the kinetics of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein for early clinical stability in patients with bloodstream infections due to Gram-negative bacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ryuzo and colleagues discovered a similar result, where CRP and interleukin-6 were higher in gramnegative bacteremia than in gram-positive bacteremia in intensive care unit patients [1]. Another study also showed CRP and procalcitonin as effective predictors of bloodstream GNB infection [20]. Although laboratory data may act as potential indicators of GNB infection, it still requires time to obtain the result, and this may jeopardize the early treatment strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Ryuzo and colleagues discovered a similar result, where CRP and interleukin-6 were higher in gramnegative bacteremia than in gram-positive bacteremia in intensive care unit patients [1]. Another study also showed CRP and procalcitonin as effective predictors of bloodstream GNB infection [20]. Although laboratory data may act as potential indicators of GNB infection, it still requires time to obtain the result, and this may jeopardize the early treatment strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Ryuzo and colleagues discovered a similar result, where CRP and interleukin-6 were higher in gramnegative bacteremia than in gram-positive bacteremia in intensive care unit patients [1]. Another study also showed CRP and procalcitonin as effective predictors of bloodstream GNB infection [22]. Although laboratory data may act as potential indicators of GNB infection, it still requires time to obtain the result, and this may jeopardize the early treatment strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, the decision of a more incisive diagnostic workup and therapy may be due to the CRP non-decrease, while waiting for blood cultures results. 32 In addition, a meta-analysis and systematic review concluded that the weighted mean difference of CRP levels beyond 48 hours was significantly higher in non-survivors when compared to survivors, which suggests that CRP level after 48 hours may be a good outcome predictor in critically ill patients. 33 Our sample with a median SAPS II of 39 predicts an intra-hospital mortality rate of 43.8%.…”
Section: Fast Responsementioning
confidence: 99%