1988
DOI: 10.1016/0093-691x(88)90305-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive value of palpation per rectum vs milk and serum progesterone levels for the diagnosis of bovine follicular and luteal cysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sprecher et al [66] obtained a correlation coefficient of 0.68 between milk progesterone measured by radioimmunoassay and luteal diameter measured by ultrasonography. Song-Chang et al [67] also reported a significant correlation between CL size (as determined by ultrasonography) and milk progesterone concentration in 16 dairy cows.…”
Section: Corpora Luteamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sprecher et al [66] obtained a correlation coefficient of 0.68 between milk progesterone measured by radioimmunoassay and luteal diameter measured by ultrasonography. Song-Chang et al [67] also reported a significant correlation between CL size (as determined by ultrasonography) and milk progesterone concentration in 16 dairy cows.…”
Section: Corpora Luteamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ovarian cysts are defined as follicle-like structures of diameter greater than 25 mm persisting for at least 7-10 days in the absence of a corpus luteum (Garverick 1997). The incidence of COD in dairy herds has been reported to vary from 5 to 30% (Eyestone and Ax 1984;Nakao et al 1985;Sprecher et al 1988;Ashmawy et al 1992;Garverick 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been known that estradiol given with PRID has both a luteolytic role as well as a key role in synchronizing follicular waves [13,14]. Until recently, some reports have shown that it is difficult to discriminate between ovarian cyst and cystic corpus luteum (CCL) by rectal palpation [13,15,16]. The accuracy of the diagnosis of FC and luteal cyst (LC) by palpation via rectum has been reported to be 58 to 68% [9,17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the diagnosis of FC and luteal cyst (LC) by palpation via rectum has been reported to be 58 to 68% [9,17]. LC and CCL have a thicker cystic wall and are usually associated with higher peripheral concentrations of progesterone compared with FC [16,18]. Therefore, PRID might be used in cows with LC or CCL in the clinical field, when the primary diagnosis of ovarian function was based on by rectal palpation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%