2020
DOI: 10.1186/s43055-020-00366-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive value of neck imaging reporting and data system (NIRADS) in CECT/CEMRI of laryngeal and oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

Abstract: Background The neck imaging reporting and data system (NI-RADS) is a structured reporting algorithm linked with further patient management recommendations. This study was conducted to assess the overall and time point predictive value of the NI-RADS in laryngeal and oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT). Results The rate of tumor recurrence was statistically different among the NI-RADS 1-3 categorie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 30 ] reported an almost perfect agreement for APHE, washout, and capsular enhancement, with a κ of 0.948, 0.949, and 0.848, respectively. The standardized report must be a dynamic process, updated and refined continuously according to radiological experience, clinical consensus, and data validation [ 31 , 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 30 ] reported an almost perfect agreement for APHE, washout, and capsular enhancement, with a κ of 0.948, 0.949, and 0.848, respectively. The standardized report must be a dynamic process, updated and refined continuously according to radiological experience, clinical consensus, and data validation [ 31 , 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standardized reporting technique must be a dynamic process that is subject to clinical and radiological reassessment as well as data validation in order to be evaluated and developed further [22][23][24]. The DWI was regarded as one of the minor characteristics in the LI-RADS v2018 for categorization of the nontreated hepatic focal lesion, while the LI-RADS treatment response is based solely on the enhanced pattern of the treated HCC, and it does not include the DWI and ADC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study the accuracy of ADC and SUV ratio were comparable, and further studies may reveal the added value of ADC and PET/CT for the detection of the residual HCC after TACE. The standardized reporting method must be a dynamic process, subjected to clinical and radiological feedback and data validation, for further evaluation and development [25,26], both DWI and FDG PET/CT gained the advantage of avoiding contrast administration, which may be a major problem in patients suffering from renal impairment.…”
Section: F Ementioning
confidence: 99%