2016
DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.03.132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive Value of Intraoperative Thromboelastometry for the Risk of Perioperative Excessive Blood Loss in Infants and Children Undergoing Congenital Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
15
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Bias from unknown or unmeasured confounders may have influenced the results. For example, intraoperative blood loss volume should be obtained from gauze count, discard suction volume (except irrigation fluid volume), chest tube output at the end of surgery and total intraoperative volume of salvaged red blood cells [46]. However, it is difficult to measure all these variables routinely in the OR and using the recorded blood loss volume in the study may carry a significant error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bias from unknown or unmeasured confounders may have influenced the results. For example, intraoperative blood loss volume should be obtained from gauze count, discard suction volume (except irrigation fluid volume), chest tube output at the end of surgery and total intraoperative volume of salvaged red blood cells [46]. However, it is difficult to measure all these variables routinely in the OR and using the recorded blood loss volume in the study may carry a significant error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, this is a descriptive study with a surrogate (i.e., without a clinical) endpoint. However, as this surrogate endpoint has been correlated with relevant clinical endpoints in the past [64][65][66][67][68] and recently [69][70][71], it should allow generation of solid hypotheses to lay basis for further clinical studies. Also, this is a single center study, and the results may therefore be influenced by local specifics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43 Interestingly the findings of the authors' systematic review contrast with the findings from the pediatric cardiac surgery literature, in which thromboelastometry has been found to predict major bleeding. 44,45 This might be explained by the smaller blood volume of children, leading to more hemodilution and coagulopathy by CPB. These hemostatic disturbances as the main cause of major blood loss in children would explain the discrepancy in the predictive value of thromboelastometry compared with adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hypothesis is supported by the fact that the body weight and duration of CPB are the best predictors for massive hemorrhage in pediatric cardiac surgery. [44][45][46] The current cohort study is limited by the small sample size, retrospective data analysis, relative low blood loss and transfusion requirements, and the inclusion of both patients at low and high risk for bleeding. Furthermore, the earliest data from the cohort study date back to 2008.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%