1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)03053-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive value of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for relapse rate and changes in disability or impairment in multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
243
1
7

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 446 publications
(272 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
21
243
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…New lesion activity is transient and not equally apparent at all times, and not all focal activity reaches the threshold of MRI sensitivity. Such a view is supported by the finding that the variance of enhancing lesion counts over 6 months proved to be a better predictor for relapse rate than the actual baseline lesion number 20 -indicative not only of the temporal variability of disease activity, but also of the narrow time window for capturing contrast enhancement.…”
Section: Mri Variablesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…New lesion activity is transient and not equally apparent at all times, and not all focal activity reaches the threshold of MRI sensitivity. Such a view is supported by the finding that the variance of enhancing lesion counts over 6 months proved to be a better predictor for relapse rate than the actual baseline lesion number 20 -indicative not only of the temporal variability of disease activity, but also of the narrow time window for capturing contrast enhancement.…”
Section: Mri Variablesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Translated into a crosssectional scenario, this would match exactly the observation that the variability of new lesion appearance was a stronger predictor of disease activity than was the overall number of lesions. 20 Note that the level and dynamic activity of a single new lesion in this paradigm is not to be mistaken for the overall level of disease activity, which is most commonly assessed as the total number of new lesions observed.…”
Section: Fig 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain shows typical white matter (WM) lesions on proton density (PD)-weighted and T2-weighted images. Predicting prognosis and making treatment decisions for individual patients based on these images is challenging, as correlations between brain lesion burden visualized on MRI, and disability progression measured by expanded disability status scale (EDSS, possible range: 0 -10, with a higher score indicating a higher degree of disability (1)), are only moderate (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). This may be caused by several mechanisms: the presence of symptomatic spinal cord lesions in combination with relatively few brain lesions, pathology in normal-appearing WM (NAWM) and normal-appearing gray matter that is not visualized on conventional MRI, pathological heterogeneity (edema, demyelination, axonal loss, or gliosis) of lesions visualized on PD-weighted and T2-weighted images, and the fact that a proportion of the lesions visualized on MRI may be clinically silent (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9).…”
Section: Multiple Sclerosis (Ms) Is a Multifocal Inflammatory Demyelimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have demonstrated that Gd enhancement is correlated with the occurrence of clinical relapses in MS (1)(2)(3). The number or volume of Gd-enhancing lesions is useful for evaluating biologically relevant treatment effects (4,5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%