2018
DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000002315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive Value of FDG PET/CT Versus Bone Marrow Biopsy in Pediatric Lymphoma

Abstract: Purpose The aim of this study was to explore the positive predictive value and negative predictive value of FDG PET/CT. The prognostic impact of tumor burden of bone marrow infiltrates was diagnosed by FDG PET/CT at initial presentation. Methods This retrospective study enrolled 140 pediatric patients with pathologically proven lymphoma (113 Hodgkin disease and 27 Non-Hodgkin lymphoma). All patients had pretherapy FDG PET/CT. Bone marrow biopsy (BMB), c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the study made by Badr et al [34], who included 27 patients with NHL and found the sensitivity of PET/CT was 100% while that of BMB was 42.9% and the specificity was 100% in both.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This is consistent with the study made by Badr et al [34], who included 27 patients with NHL and found the sensitivity of PET/CT was 100% while that of BMB was 42.9% and the specificity was 100% in both.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Among these molecular biomarkers, the PHOX2B in bone marrow and peripheral blood had the best diagnostic performance and was considered to be the most optimal biomarker for BMI detection [29][30][31]. Some previous researches had confirmed the value of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in detecting BMI compared with BMB in lymphoma [32][33][34][35]. However, few studies had explored the role of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in NB [8], and there was no study comparing PHOX2B with 18 F-FDG PET/CT in NB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This systematic review involved some limitations. In some studies PET/CT images were interpreted using qualitative criteria [15][16][17]19,20,22,26,29,31,[34][35][36][37][38][39]42,43,47,48,50,[52][53][54], whereas in other studies both qualitative and quantitative criteria were used [18,21,[23][24][25]27,28,30,32,33,40,41,[44][45][46]49,51,55]. As the qualitative evaluation is based on a subject's experience, this might underestimate the PET/CT diagnostic performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%