2003
DOI: 10.1002/cbm.536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive validity despite social desirability: evidence for the robustness of self‐report among offenders

Abstract: The authors propose that impression management may be an enduring person-based characteristic within an offender sample rather than a situationally determined response style. The variance associated with this characterological information is proposed to be the source of the unique predictive variance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
74
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
7
74
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While previous research purports the susceptibility of self-report methods to response distortion (Edens et al, 2001), this study is consistent with previous research (Mills & Kroner, 2003;Mills & Kroner, 2006) contributing to the debate by suggesting that self-report methods may indeed be appropriate for detecting psychopathy, though further research is necessary to generalise these results. The present study also provides support for the utilisation of the SRP-III to identify individuals with psychopathic tendencies within a community sample, given that the distribution of SRP-III scores (in particular 1% of the sample presenting with clearly elevated scores) is consistent with other preliminary research in the area (Neumann and Hare, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…While previous research purports the susceptibility of self-report methods to response distortion (Edens et al, 2001), this study is consistent with previous research (Mills & Kroner, 2003;Mills & Kroner, 2006) contributing to the debate by suggesting that self-report methods may indeed be appropriate for detecting psychopathy, though further research is necessary to generalise these results. The present study also provides support for the utilisation of the SRP-III to identify individuals with psychopathic tendencies within a community sample, given that the distribution of SRP-III scores (in particular 1% of the sample presenting with clearly elevated scores) is consistent with other preliminary research in the area (Neumann and Hare, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Results that are based on self-report data obtained from offenders can be susceptible to deception. It is argued that offenders possibly lie, fake assumptions, and cannot be trusted (Camp 1999;Mills et al 2003;Kroner and Loza 2001). However, inmates agree on their assessment of the prison conditions since they answer in a systematic fashion (Camp 1999).…”
Section: Instruments and Variables: Inmatesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Notably, raw pre-post differences make no adjustments for measurement error. Some self-report questionnaires may not be valid when used to predict offender recidivism or they have inferior validity as compared to clinician-rated measures (Mills, Loza, & Kroner, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%