2006
DOI: 10.1039/b515914h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive theory for the combination kinetics of two alkyl radicals

Abstract: An ab initio transition state theory based procedure for accurately predicting the combination kinetics of two alkyl radicals is described. This procedure employs direct evaluations of the orientation dependent interaction energies at the CASPT2/cc-pvdz level within variable reaction coordinate transition state theory (VRC-TST). One-dimensional corrections to these energies are obtained from CAS+1+2/aug-cc-pvtz calculations for CH3 + CH3 along its combination reaction path. Direct CAS+1+2/aug-cc-pvtz calculati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
272
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(298 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
(159 reference statements)
21
272
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When a reaction was thought to proceed through addition (as is the case with most of the radical-radical reactions), in the absence of theoretical calculations, we have considered that there was no barrier when the ground state of the adduct arises from pairing up electrons on the two radicals reactants, whereas the surface was likely be repulsive if all the electrons remain unpaired. Therefore, doublet + doublet reactions were considered to have no barrier for the singlet surface but a barrier for the triplet surfaces (which is in good agreement with experimental and theoretical results for H + alkyl or alkyl + alkyl reactions for example, Harding et al 2005;Klippenstein et al 2006). When no energetic barrier was found to be present, the value of the rate constant was estimated using long-range forces, mainly through dispersion interactions (Stoecklin & Clary 1992;, and by taking into account the electronic degeneracy γ el .…”
Section: Estimation Of Reaction Rates For New Processessupporting
confidence: 56%
“…When a reaction was thought to proceed through addition (as is the case with most of the radical-radical reactions), in the absence of theoretical calculations, we have considered that there was no barrier when the ground state of the adduct arises from pairing up electrons on the two radicals reactants, whereas the surface was likely be repulsive if all the electrons remain unpaired. Therefore, doublet + doublet reactions were considered to have no barrier for the singlet surface but a barrier for the triplet surfaces (which is in good agreement with experimental and theoretical results for H + alkyl or alkyl + alkyl reactions for example, Harding et al 2005;Klippenstein et al 2006). When no energetic barrier was found to be present, the value of the rate constant was estimated using long-range forces, mainly through dispersion interactions (Stoecklin & Clary 1992;, and by taking into account the electronic degeneracy γ el .…”
Section: Estimation Of Reaction Rates For New Processessupporting
confidence: 56%
“…This correction factor accounts for the small degree of recrossing of the variable reaction coordinate transition state dividing surfaces as estimated in prior work for related reactions. 62 One-dimensional correction potentials were employed to approximately account for the limitations in the basis set, in the active space, and for geometry relaxation. The basis set corrections were obtained from CBS extrapolations based on explicit calculations with cc-pVTZ and cc-pVQZ basis sets.…”
Section: ■ Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the ab initio potential based results, we employ our direct variable reaction coordinate-TST approach. 31,32 We also employ rigid-body trajectory simulations of the capture process for long-range representations of the potential to examine the deviations from statistical predictions for both the overall rate coefficient and the product branching. These trajectory simulations are performed as described in refs 33 and 34.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%