2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive performance of the SOFA and mSOFA scoring systems for predicting in-hospital mortality in the emergency department

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
20
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…38 These results are consistent with our findings in determining the predictive value of the SOFA score for prognosis of patients with severe AIS. While the AUCs of the SOFA scoring system reported in various studies ranged from 0.70 to 0.87, [39][40][41] we showed similar values between 0.722 to 0.866 in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…38 These results are consistent with our findings in determining the predictive value of the SOFA score for prognosis of patients with severe AIS. While the AUCs of the SOFA scoring system reported in various studies ranged from 0.70 to 0.87, [39][40][41] we showed similar values between 0.722 to 0.866 in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Earlier studies have used, for example, discharge diagnoses, single organ failure scoring system or modified 2001 sepsis consensus organ failure definitions 8–11 51. Recently, most studies present organ failure data based on the SOFA Score,24 25 but some of the values are not clinical applicable to the ED, and this have led to almost equal attempts to modify the SOFA Score to fit the different ED settings in studies conducted 42 52 53. These approaches are almost identical to our modified organ failure definitions, but the circulatory and respiratory differs slightly from study to study due to differences in accessible information in different ED settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in retrospective studies, complex scores such as APACHE II or SOFA are likely to be unhelpful due to missing values. We used the modified SOFA (mSOFA) score to limit the impact on missing variables, due to the retrospective nature of our study [ 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We could not calculate this variable in patients for whom WBC counts were within or below normal range during the entire study period. To define sepsis, we used a modified sequential organ failure assessment (mSOFA) to overcome the limitations due to missing values [ 22 , 23 ]. A serial mSOFA was calculated on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 with the most abnormal values in the 24-h period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%