2022
DOI: 10.1111/nyas.14783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive models for human–AI nexus in group decision making

Abstract: Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) have had a profound impact on our lives. Domains like health and learning are naturally helped by human-AI interactions and decision making. In these areas, as ML algorithms prove their value in making important decisions, humans add their distinctive expertise and judgment on social and interpersonal issues that need to be considered in tandem with algorithmic inputs of information. Some questions naturally arise. What rules and regulations should be invo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 105 publications
(138 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, fairness in hiring, lending, and imprisonment is related to AI decision-making applications [15]. Also, decision-making algorithms operate in complex socio-technical environments (for example, human-AI interactions make a significant part of risky decision-making in health and learning [20]). Human-AI interfaces will become increasingly widespread as ML algorithms are practical in real-world settings to help to improve human decision-making [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, fairness in hiring, lending, and imprisonment is related to AI decision-making applications [15]. Also, decision-making algorithms operate in complex socio-technical environments (for example, human-AI interactions make a significant part of risky decision-making in health and learning [20]). Human-AI interfaces will become increasingly widespread as ML algorithms are practical in real-world settings to help to improve human decision-making [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%