2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive modeling of laser and electron beam powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of metals at the mesoscale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several numerical methods are capable of simulating microstructures in AM at the required level of resolution, i.e., at the mesoscopic scale (that spans from nanometres to micrometres) and at the continuum scale. Some examples of these are front-tracking [28], phase field (PF) [12,19,[29][30][31], level set (LS) [32], lattice Boltzmann (LB) [30,33], Potts kinetic Monte Carlo (kMC) [12,19,30,34], cellular automata [12,19,29,30] and the Johnson-Mehl-Avrami-Kolmogorov (JMAK) theory-based phenomenological model [35,36]. These varied techniques have unique strengths and weaknesses [12,19,30] which means modellers can select the method best suited to their tasks based on these considerations.…”
Section: A Summary Of Modelling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several numerical methods are capable of simulating microstructures in AM at the required level of resolution, i.e., at the mesoscopic scale (that spans from nanometres to micrometres) and at the continuum scale. Some examples of these are front-tracking [28], phase field (PF) [12,19,[29][30][31], level set (LS) [32], lattice Boltzmann (LB) [30,33], Potts kinetic Monte Carlo (kMC) [12,19,30,34], cellular automata [12,19,29,30] and the Johnson-Mehl-Avrami-Kolmogorov (JMAK) theory-based phenomenological model [35,36]. These varied techniques have unique strengths and weaknesses [12,19,30] which means modellers can select the method best suited to their tasks based on these considerations.…”
Section: A Summary Of Modelling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are either measured during experiments or estimated at the continuum scale using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) or the finite element method (FEM). Recently, the use of lattice Boltzmann method-based hydrodynamics tools for the purpose was demonstrated [33,42]. These can take into account the random distributions of powder particles by size in a layer, and the propagation of the laser (or electron beam) that includes multiple reflections, phase transitions, thermal conductivity, and detailed liquid dynamics of the molten metal.…”
Section: A Summary Of Modelling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zakirov et al [55] presented the results of 3D modeling of with Gaussian distributed particles [53] Fig. 14: Different regimes of laser absorption during powder bed fusion process in 3D numerical simulations: cross-section along axis of laser movement [55] the laser and electron beam powder bed fusion process at the mesoscale with a self-developed advanced multi-physical numerical tool. The hydrodynamics and thermal conductivity core of the tool is based on the lattice Boltzmann method.…”
Section: Melting and Flow Behavior Of Metal Particles And Defect Formation Mechanism Based On Discrete Powder Particle Heat Flux Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, mathematical modeling methods are rather relevant due to the fact that they can be used to obtain the data on processes that have occurred in a molten pool by conducting computational experiments. Today, a large number of papers have been published on the analysis of heat and mass transfer phenomena in the implementation of additive technologies [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%