Predictive Modeling for Occupational Safety Outcomes and Days Away from Work Analysis in Mining Operations

Abstract

Mining is known to be one of the most hazardous occupations in the world. Many serious accidents have occurred worldwide over the years in mining. Although there have been efforts to create a safer work environment for miners, the number of accidents occurring at the mining sites is still significant. Machine learning techniques and predictive analytics are becoming one of the leading resources to create safer work environments in the manufacturing and construction industries. These techniques are leveraged to generate actionable insights to improve decision-making. A large amount of mining safety-related data are available, and machine learning algorithms can be used to analyze the data. The use of machine learning techniques can significantly benefit the mining industry. Decision tree, random forest, and artificial neural networks were implemented to analyze the outcomes of mining accidents. These machine learning models were also used to predict days away from work. An accidents dataset provided by the Mine Safety and Health Administration was used to train the models. The models were trained separately on tabular data and narratives. The use of a synthetic data augmentation technique using word embedding was also investigated to tackle the data imbalance problem. Performance of all the models was compared with the performance of the traditional logistic regression model. The results show that models trained on narratives performed better than the models trained on structured/tabular data in predicting the outcome of the accident. The higher predictive power of the models trained on narratives led to the conclusion that the narratives have additional information relevant to the outcome of injury compared to the tabular entries. The models trained on tabular data had a lower mean squared error compared to the models trained on narratives while predicting the days away from work. The results highlight the importance of predictors, like shift start time, accident time, and mining experience in predicting the days away from work. It was found that the F1 score of all the underrepresented classes except one improved after the use of the data augmentation technique. This approach gave greater insight into the factors influencing the outcome of the accident and days away from work.

REDECA: A Novel Framework to Review Artificial Intelligence and Its Applications in Occupational Safety and Health

“…Most of the reviewed papers focused on structural and environmental mine conditions could be used to analyze the main routes that contain hazardous situations and eliminate them by decreasing or completely removing workers from those conditions [ 136 ] ( Table 6 ). Also, ML techniques such as decision tree, RF, and NN can predict the outcome of mining injuries and days away from work using an injury dataset provided by the Mine Safety and Health Administration [ 137 ]. AI technologies supporting the safety and health of mineworkers can be organized in two broad categories, sensors and wearable devices and are explored further in this section.…”

Retrospective assessment of the association between noise exposure and nonfatal and fatal injury rates among miners in the United States from 1983 to 2014

“…characteristics were not assessed in this study, but may modify the risk or severity of injuries and fatalities. [36][37][38][39][40] Unfortunately, these types of data are not often available at the temporal and spatial scales assessed in this study.…”

Using Neural Networks in Order to Analyze Telework Adaptability across the European Union Countries: A Case Study of the Most Relevant Scenarios to Occur in Romania

“…As described in Section 3.1, the network that generated the lowest value for the mean squared error (MSE) in the validation dataset represented the optimum choice for our research, as it ensured the prediction rigorousness for the model. The training process continued until the network accomplished the closest output value to the sought-after output by continuously modifying the unit weights correspondingly [47].…”