2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-019-00656-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive model for seismic vulnerability assessment of churches based on the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lagomarsino and Podesta (2004) carried out damage and vulnerability assessments of churches after the 2002 Molise, Italy, earthquake [39]. Matteis et al (2019) investigated a predictive methodology for vulnerability assessment of churches in large territorial areas [40]. Ruggieri et al (2020) described the seismic vulnerability of a sample of 90 masonry one-nave churches, subjected to the Valle Scrivia Earthquake, 2003 and supported similar studies describing masonry buildings [41,42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Lagomarsino and Podesta (2004) carried out damage and vulnerability assessments of churches after the 2002 Molise, Italy, earthquake [39]. Matteis et al (2019) investigated a predictive methodology for vulnerability assessment of churches in large territorial areas [40]. Ruggieri et al (2020) described the seismic vulnerability of a sample of 90 masonry one-nave churches, subjected to the Valle Scrivia Earthquake, 2003 and supported similar studies describing masonry buildings [41,42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Masonry churches are not designed to withstand horizontal loads and their vulnerability is considerably higher than that of ordinary masonry buildings. This conjecture is confirmed by the damage that has occurred during the seismic events that have struck Italy in the recent decades (Doglioni, F, Moretti, A, and Petrini 1994;Da Porto et al 2012;Sorrentino et al 2014;De Matteis et al 2019;Penna et al 2019). Because of their structural morphology, characterised by a prevailing longitudinal dimension, slender perimeter walls and the lack of internal diaphragms, churches rarely show a global response to seismic action, but rather a local response in which the most vulnerable structural elements detach from the rest and collapse with a rigid body motion (Lagomarsino and Podestà 2004a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…After the recent seismic events, many efforts of the scientific community have been done in order to develop appropriate procedures for implementing seismic vulnerability analysis (Formisano, 2017;Formisano and Marzo, 2017;Laterza et al, 2017;Lopez et al, 2019) and specific retrofitting interventions (Faggiano et al, 2009;Terracciano et al, 2015;D'Amato et al, 2017;Milani et al, 2017bMilani et al, , 2018. In particular, as previously introduced, recurrent seismic damages were observed in historic masonry buildings characterized by local out-of-plane and in-plane response mechanisms regarding one or more isolated structure portions (Lagomarsino and Podestà, 2004;Formisano et al, 2010;Leite et al, 2013;Gattulli et al, 2014;Milani and Valente, 2015b;Stockdale, 2016;Valente et al, 2016;Betti et al, 2018;De Matteis et al, 2019;Fuentes et al, 2019b;Penna et al, 2019;Ramirez et al, 2019).…”
Section: Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Of Historical Constructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%