2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive large eddy simulations for urban flows: Challenges and opportunities

Abstract: Computational fluid dynamics predictions of urban flow are subject to several sources of uncertainty, such as the definition of the inflow boundary conditions or the turbulence model. Compared to Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations, large eddy simulations (LES) can reduce turbulence model uncertainty by resolving the turbulence down to scales in the inertial subrange, but the presence of other uncertainties will not be reduced. The objective of this study is to present an initial investigation o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(47 reference statements)
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We hypothesize that the omission of trees and bushes in the model, together with a less dense building layout, is responsible for the turbulence underprediction at that location. The overall performance in predicting TKE is reasonable, given all the challenges already mentioned, and is essentially the same as the one by García‐Sánchez et al (2018) using a solid wall approach (body‐fitted grid) to model the buildings (see Table 1), in both cases finding a positive fractional bias (underprediction) of TKE, attributed to the reasons already discussed.…”
Section: Urban Environment Flow Turbulence and Dispersion During Thsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We hypothesize that the omission of trees and bushes in the model, together with a less dense building layout, is responsible for the turbulence underprediction at that location. The overall performance in predicting TKE is reasonable, given all the challenges already mentioned, and is essentially the same as the one by García‐Sánchez et al (2018) using a solid wall approach (body‐fitted grid) to model the buildings (see Table 1), in both cases finding a positive fractional bias (underprediction) of TKE, attributed to the reasons already discussed.…”
Section: Urban Environment Flow Turbulence and Dispersion During Thsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…One of the advantages of LES of urban canopies versus other more simplified types of models is its superior performance in predicting turbulence related quantities (e.g., García‐Sánchez et al, 2018). Moreover, LES has the advantage that is inherently unsteady and thus reproduces the spectral distribution of eddy motions that can be resolved by a given grid spacing.…”
Section: Urban Environment Flow Turbulence and Dispersion During Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While being computationally more expensive than RANS, LES has been shown to perform better in resolving instantaneous turbulence structures in a complex urban environment (García-Sánchez et al, 2018;Salim et al, 2011). Further, air pollutant concentrations can be significantly modified by their chemical and physical processes (Kurppa et al, 2019;Nikolova et al, 2016;Zhong et al, 2020), especially as the residence time of air pollutants is increased in a complex urban environment (Gronemeier and Sühring, 2019;Ramponi et al, 2015). Therefore, a detailed module describing the characteristics of air pollutants and their dynamics is needed to enable modelling aerosol particles of different size, chemical composition and harmfulness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed information on the variability of urban air pollutant concentrations are, however, highly valuable to urban planning to design healthy living environments (Giles-Corti et al, 2016;Kurppa et al, 2018), to air quality monitoring network design, and to conducting exposure studies. Therefore, a building-resolving tool for simulating and predicting air quality in real complex urban environments in current and future conditions is needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%