2024
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1369177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive language processing: integrating comprehension and production, and what atypical populations can tell us

Simone Gastaldon,
Noemi Bonfiglio,
Francesco Vespignani
et al.

Abstract: Predictive processing, a crucial aspect of human cognition, is also relevant for language comprehension. In everyday situations, we exploit various sources of information to anticipate and therefore facilitate processing of upcoming linguistic input. In the literature, there are a variety of models that aim at accounting for such ability. One group of models propose a strict relationship between prediction and language production mechanisms. In this review, we first introduce very briefly the concept of predic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 153 publications
(210 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in line with the results reported in Gastaldon et al (2023): AWS seem less efficient at generating predictions during listening, hypothesized as a result of the inability to fully exploit their speech-motor network. Thus, further studies should investigate whether there is a causal link between CTS and specific processes of speech comprehension such as prediction, and how this causal chain may impact people with different speech and language deficits, especially in interactive contexts (see also Gastaldon et al, 2024 on the importance of studying atypical populations for a better understanding of predictive speech processing). In conclusion, research should move towards turn-based and conversational contexts (e.g., Jackson et al, 2021; Weiss, 1995) to investigate possible subtle differences in how spoken language comprehension is achieved in the stuttering brain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in line with the results reported in Gastaldon et al (2023): AWS seem less efficient at generating predictions during listening, hypothesized as a result of the inability to fully exploit their speech-motor network. Thus, further studies should investigate whether there is a causal link between CTS and specific processes of speech comprehension such as prediction, and how this causal chain may impact people with different speech and language deficits, especially in interactive contexts (see also Gastaldon et al, 2024 on the importance of studying atypical populations for a better understanding of predictive speech processing). In conclusion, research should move towards turn-based and conversational contexts (e.g., Jackson et al, 2021; Weiss, 1995) to investigate possible subtle differences in how spoken language comprehension is achieved in the stuttering brain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%