2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2210.00173
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive Inference with Feature Conformal Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, to tackle the uncertainty issues, traditional methods (e.g., Bayesian approximation) for establishing confidence in prediction models usually make strict assumptions and have high computational cost properties. In this work, we build upon conformal prediction (Gibbs and Candes 2021;Chernozhukov, Wüthrich, and Yinchu 2018;Xu and Xie 2023;Tibshirani et al 2019;Teng et al 2022;Martinez et al 2023;Ndiaye 2022;Lu et al 2022;Jaramillo and Smirnov 2021;Liu et al 2022), which do not require strict assumptions on the underlying data distribution and has been applied before to classification and regression problems to attain marginal coverage. However, our work is different from existing conformal works in that we first model explanation prediction uncertainties in both scenarios -with and without true explanations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, to tackle the uncertainty issues, traditional methods (e.g., Bayesian approximation) for establishing confidence in prediction models usually make strict assumptions and have high computational cost properties. In this work, we build upon conformal prediction (Gibbs and Candes 2021;Chernozhukov, Wüthrich, and Yinchu 2018;Xu and Xie 2023;Tibshirani et al 2019;Teng et al 2022;Martinez et al 2023;Ndiaye 2022;Lu et al 2022;Jaramillo and Smirnov 2021;Liu et al 2022), which do not require strict assumptions on the underlying data distribution and has been applied before to classification and regression problems to attain marginal coverage. However, our work is different from existing conformal works in that we first model explanation prediction uncertainties in both scenarios -with and without true explanations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%