Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.atech.2022.100154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive framework of plant height in commercial cotton fields using a remote sensing and machine learning approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite using a linear model for ground elevation adjustment, their reported RMSE error for maize crop height remains around 14.17 cm. Meanwhile, our findings are in agreement with the study by Da Silva Andrea et al [19] which tested different machine learning algorithms combined with different manual feature selections using satellite multispectral imagery for cotton height prediction during the entire growing season and obtained MAE errors ranging from 8 to 25 cm. Moreover, Osco et al [18] reported RMSE errors between 17 cm and 30 cm for maize plant height predictions using drone multispectral images, combined with machine learning methodologies and manual feature extraction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite using a linear model for ground elevation adjustment, their reported RMSE error for maize crop height remains around 14.17 cm. Meanwhile, our findings are in agreement with the study by Da Silva Andrea et al [19] which tested different machine learning algorithms combined with different manual feature selections using satellite multispectral imagery for cotton height prediction during the entire growing season and obtained MAE errors ranging from 8 to 25 cm. Moreover, Osco et al [18] reported RMSE errors between 17 cm and 30 cm for maize plant height predictions using drone multispectral images, combined with machine learning methodologies and manual feature extraction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…To be specific, Vegetation Indices (VIs), derived from mathematical formulations of canopy spectral reflectances, have a strong relation to specific characteristics in crops. Recently, some studies have used these specific VIs through machine learning methods to develop models for crop height prediction including wheat [17], maize [18], cotton [19], potatoes [20], and sunflower [21]. Unlike the traditional method that relies on preset models or equations, machine learning uses specific features as model input to calibrate and identify the most optimal parameters with the ground truth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High temporal resolution data collection facilitates a better understanding of end of season traits that are the culmination of a growing season's worth of genotype-by-environment interactions (de Jesus Colwell et al, 2021). 5 Such temporal measurements have been completed on canopy cover and biomass in soybean (Moreira et al, 2019;Herrero-Huerta and Rainey, 2019;Li et al, 2022;Freitas Moreira et al, 2021), plant height, canopy cover, growth dynamics, and yield prediction in barley (Herzig et al, 2021), plant height and canopy cover in banana (Musa paradisiaca L.) (Aeberli et al, 2023), nutrient status, canopy cover, canopy volume, and plant height in potatoes (Liu et al, 2021;de Jesus Colwell et al, 2021), plant height in cotton (da Silva Andrea et al, 2023), and plant height in eggplant, tomato, cabbage (Moeckel et al, 2018). In maize, multi-temporal measurements of multiple traits have been used to explain the effect of phosphorus on plant growth and final yield (Pedersen et al, 2021;Herrmann et al, 2020), phenotypic variation due to genotypic background differences (Pugh et al, 2018;Han et al, 2019;Alper Adak, Anderson, et al, 2023;Adak, Murray, Božinović, et al, 2021;Adak et al, 2024), phenotypic variation due to environmental factors such as drought (Machado et al, 2002) or high-speed wind events (Tirado et al, 2021), and canopy cover (Jin et al, 2020;Lu et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this method was effective in a soybean field, collecting measurements 4 rows at a time is time-consuming and as maize gets much taller throughout the seasons measurements would be increasingly difficult to use this approach. In commercial cotton fields, plant height was estimated using satellite imagery containing multi-spectral bands and machine learning, with height estimates over large areas, averaging 15 measurements across 175 acre fields (da Silva Andrea et al, 2023). While this study was able to show some success in estimating plant height with R 2 values as high as 0.87, the study areas are too large for useful sub-field resolution information needed for precision farming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%