Predictive factors of venous recanalization in upper-extremity vein thrombosis

Abstract

Background Upper extremity venous thrombosis (UEVT) represents about 10% of venous thrombo-embolic disease. This is mainly explained by the increasing use of central venous line, for oncologic or nutritional care. The factors associated with venous recanalization are not known. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate prognosis factor associated with venous recanalization after UEVT. Methods This study included patients with UEVT diagnosed with duplex ultra-sonography (DUS) from January 2015 to December 2017 with DUS evaluations during follow-up. A multivariate Cox proportional-hazards-model analysis was performed to identify predictive factors of UEVT complete recanalization. Results This study included 494 UEVT, 304 proximal UEVT and 190 distal UEVT. The median age was 58 years, 39.5% were women. Clinical context was: hematological malignancy (40.7%), solid cancer (14.2%), infectious or inflammatory context (49.9%) and presence of venous catheters or pacemaker leads in 86.4%. The rate of recanalization without sequelae of UEVT was 38%. For all UEVT, in multivariate analysis, factors associated with complete vein recanalization were: thrombosis associated with central venous catheter (CVC) (HR:2.40, [1.45;3.95], p<0.001), UEVT limited to a venous segment (HR:1.94, [1.26;3.00], p = 0.003), occlusive thrombosis (HR:0.48 [0.34;0.67], p<0.0001), the presence of a PICC Line (HR:2.29, [1.48;3.52], p<0.001), a thrombosis of deep and distal topography (HR:1.70, [1.10;2.63], p = 0.02) or superficial thrombosis of the forearm (HR:2.79, [1.52;5.12], p<0.001). For deep and proximal UEVT, non-occlusive UEVT (HR:2.23, [1.49;3.33], p<0.0001), thrombosis associated with CVC (HR:1.58, [1.01;2.47], p = 0.04) and infectious or inflammatory context (HR:1.63, [1.10;2.41], p = 0.01) were factors associated with complete vein recanalization. Conclusion In this study, factors associated with UEVT recanalization were UEVT limited to a venous segment, thrombosis associated with CVC, a thrombosis of deep and distal thrombosis topography and superficial thrombosis of the forearm. Occlusive thrombosis was associated with the absence of UEVT recanalization.

Complications and risk factors on midline catheters’ follow-up about non-ICU patients: study protocol for a multicentre observational study (the midDATA study)

“…At first glance, MCs infection rate seems low (0.28/1000 catheter days) 13. However, there is little evidence of these lower rates, but also of thrombosis (3.3/1000 catheter days) and occlusions due to the quality of the studies, which are primarily retrospective cohort studies 14–16…”

“…13 However, there is little evidence of these lower rates, but also of thrombosis (3.3/1000 catheter days) and occlusions due to the quality of the studies, which are primarily retrospective cohort studies. [14][15][16] Although MCs are peripheral catheters, they often dwell for longer than 7 days, and therefore, follow-up protocols (eg, dressing changes) more closely reflect CVC protocols. Most studies describe MCs in intensive care units (ICUs), where medical and nurse staff are familiar with CVC maintenance and are focused on follow-up.…”