Predictive factors of Essure  implant placement failure: prospective, multicenter study of 495 patients

Panel, P.; Grosdemouge, I.

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.063

Cited by 72 publications

(49 citation statements)

References 17 publications

(31 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It marks a significant medical advance due to lower morbidity and higher patient acceptance [10]. The feasibility and the results of this technique are excellent [11][12][13]. Furthermore, Levie et al showed that hysteroscopic tubal sterilization is half as expensive as the laparoscopic approach [14].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Hysteroscopic placement of tubal sterilization implants: virtual reality simulator training

et al. 2012

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Hysteroscopic placement of tubal sterilization implants: virtual reality simulator training

et al. 2012

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition to the reported efficacy of 99.87%, this mode of sterilization can be performed in the office in a safe and technically feasible manner, with a successful placement rate of 94% during the first attempt. 9,10 Despite these advantages, complications associated with microinsert placement do occur, the most serious of which include perforation and microinsert migration. Perforation of the uterus or fallopian tube at the time of microinsert placement occurs in up to ϳ2% of cases.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Asymptomatic Serosalized Essure Microinsert in the Distal Ileum

Pereira

Grias

Badia

2014

CRSLS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thus, the total number of attempts was used as the denominator. Several studies included unilateral placement rates in women who had previous salpingectomies, 13,22,48 so these placement rates were omitted from the total denominators and numerators as necessary. Eight articles 9,10,17,19,25,26,30,56 only reported bilateral placement rates after more than one attempt.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Some explanations for placement success include procedure-related factors such as an in-patient setting, 16,21 a shorter procedure time, 3 greater provider experience, 3,5 and various types of medications and medication procedures. 3,5,7,21,22,29,38,47 Placement success associated with patient-related factors include prior use of an intrauterine device (IUD), 13 a history of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), 33 a lower body mass index (BMI), 11 and follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. 8,11,22 To date, there are no systematic analyses of variables associated with placement rates.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Meta-Analysis of Bilateral Essure^® Procedural Placement Success Rates on First Attempt

Frietze

Leyser‐Whalen

Rahman

et al. 2015

Journal of Gynecologic Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The EssureÒ (Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Leverkusen, Germany) female sterilization procedure entails using a hysteroscope to guide a microinsert into the Fallopian tube openings. Failed placement can lead to patient dissatisfaction, repeat procedures, unintended or ectopic pregnancy, perforation of internal organs, or need for subsequent medical interventions. Additional interventions increase women's health risks, and costs for patients and the health care industry. Demonstrated successful placement rates are 63%-100%. To date, there have not been any systematic analyses of variables associated with placement rates. Objectives: The aims of this review were: (1) to estimate the average rate of successful bilateral Essure microinsert placement on first attempt; and (2) to identify variables associated with successful placement. Materials and Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted on 64 published studies and 19 variables. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, all published studies between November 2001 and February 2015 were reviewed. The studies were taken from from PubMed and Google Scholar, and by using the the ''snowball'' method that reported variables associated with successful bilateral Essure placement rates. Results: The weighted average rate of successful bilateral microinsert placement on first attempt was 92% (0.92 [95% confidence interval: 0.904-0.931]). Variables associated with successful placements were: (1) newer device models; (2) higher body mass index; and (3) a higher percent of patients who received local anesthesia. Conclusions: The data gathered for this review indicate that the highest bilateral success rates may be obtained by utilizing the newest Essure device model with local anesthesia in heavier patients. More standardized data reporting in published Essure studies is recommended. ( J GYNECOL SURG 31:308)

show abstract

Predictive factors of Essure implant placement failure: prospective, multicenter study of 495 patients

Cited by 72 publications

References 17 publications

Hysteroscopic placement of tubal sterilization implants: virtual reality simulator training

Hysteroscopic placement of tubal sterilization implants: virtual reality simulator training

Asymptomatic Serosalized Essure Microinsert in the Distal Ileum

A Meta-Analysis of Bilateral Essure^® Procedural Placement Success Rates on First Attempt

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Predictive factors of Essure implant placement failure: prospective, multicenter study of 495 patients

Cited by 72 publications

References 17 publications

Hysteroscopic placement of tubal sterilization implants: virtual reality simulator training

Hysteroscopic placement of tubal sterilization implants: virtual reality simulator training

Asymptomatic Serosalized Essure Microinsert in the Distal Ileum

A Meta-Analysis of Bilateral Essure® Procedural Placement Success Rates on First Attempt

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

A Meta-Analysis of Bilateral Essure^® Procedural Placement Success Rates on First Attempt