1993
DOI: 10.1159/000474255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive Factors for Successful Surgical Outcome of Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact of traditionally used subjective and objective parameters on treatment outcome has been studied [10][11][12] , but the results are not reliable. In this study, all parameters after TURP changed significantly, from 55.1 to 116%, and that determined the overall effectiveness of the treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of traditionally used subjective and objective parameters on treatment outcome has been studied [10][11][12] , but the results are not reliable. In this study, all parameters after TURP changed significantly, from 55.1 to 116%, and that determined the overall effectiveness of the treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…0.52 [11]. The configuration of the prostatic transitional zone was also recorded as: (1) no evidence of transitional zone hyperplasia; (2) mild transitional zone hyperplasia; (3) marked transitional hyperplasia; (4) diffuse inflammatory change without remarkable transitional zone hyperplasia, and (5) prominent median lobe hyperplasia alone [12]. Uroflowmetry was determined using a Dantec Urodyne 1000 machine at a bladder capacity that made the patients feel the urge to urinate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum flow rate (Qmax, in ml/s), voided volume, and the corrected maximum flow rate (CQmax = Qmax/voided volume 0.5 ) were recorded [13]. The flow patterns were also recorded as normal, compressive obstructive, and constrictive obstructive patterns [12]. Residual urine determination was performed by abdominal sonography (Bruel & Kjaer model 1851) after uroflowmetry.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prostatic size was measured using the equation: height x width x length of the outer gland x 0.52 [17], Men with any evidence of small or large prostatic hyperplasia were withdrawn from the study. Recognition of prostatic hyperplasia was based upon the observation of prostatic configuration and presence of a prominent inner gland [18]. Thus, only asymptomatic men with out prostatic hyperplasia were included in the final statistics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%