2020
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1844654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive factors for secondary postpartum hemorrhage: a case-control study in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Week of birth was selected to adjust for any management changes evoked by COVID‐19, weather, or unit activity at a particular time. Parity was matched as an accepted risk factor for PPH, and may influence postnatal costs that are lower in parity than nulliparous women 3 . Maternal age was selected due to established data that younger and older mothers experience higher rates of complications that may impact cost 16 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Week of birth was selected to adjust for any management changes evoked by COVID‐19, weather, or unit activity at a particular time. Parity was matched as an accepted risk factor for PPH, and may influence postnatal costs that are lower in parity than nulliparous women 3 . Maternal age was selected due to established data that younger and older mothers experience higher rates of complications that may impact cost 16 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parity was matched as an accepted risk factor for PPH, and may influence postnatal costs that are lower in parity than nulliparous women. 3 Maternal age was selected due to established data that younger and older mothers experience higher rates of complications that may impact cost. 16 Within the study group, episodes of care relating to the management of secondary PPH occurred up to 14 weeks postpartum.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations