2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ortho.2016.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive factors for resorption of teeth adjacent to impacted maxillary canines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, these factors were previously emphasised by previous published data as contributing factors adding extra time to bring the impacted tooth into the arch. [15,[28][29][30] The limitations of the study were that only the besttreated case by each orthodontist was included and it did not involve different types of cases. Additionally, no inferential statistics were made in the present study, which would be more feasible if more cases and different groups were involved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, these factors were previously emphasised by previous published data as contributing factors adding extra time to bring the impacted tooth into the arch. [15,[28][29][30] The limitations of the study were that only the besttreated case by each orthodontist was included and it did not involve different types of cases. Additionally, no inferential statistics were made in the present study, which would be more feasible if more cases and different groups were involved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14] This complexity depends on several factors including the location (palatal, buccal), the angle of impaction, and how close the canine is to the midline. [15] Other factors that might complicate and increase the treatment time include unfavourable impaction, the method of exposure and traction, whether space has been created pre-exposure, the age of the patient, and appointment numbers relating to active orthodontic treatment. [16] Several classifications have been advocated to quantify the severity of canine impaction and to estimate the prognosis, considering how complex the treatment of each case could be.…”
Section: Intoductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Impacted canines are not weighted at all in the current state of Illinois HLD index . Due to the risk that is posed by impacted teeth, modifications should be made to the HLD index to increase approval rates for these patients …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Due to the risk that is posed by impacted teeth, modifications should be made to the HLD index to increase approval rates for these patients. 23,24 Previous research has shown that children with significant malocclusions have a decreased quality of life. [25][26][27][28][29][30] Malocclusion has been shown to decrease self-esteem and participation in social activities, increase bullying, and negatively affect performance in school.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, another study (21) concluded that the risk of resorption of the lateral incisor is not linked to the buccal or palatal situation of the canine. The risk is greater when the canine is vertically above the lateral incisor root and close to the median palatine suture, suggesting a mechanical blockage by the apex of the lateral incisor.…”
Section: B 3d Position Of Maxillary Canine Impactions and The Influence On Adjacent Incisor Root Resorption (Tab Ii)mentioning
confidence: 93%