2006 IEEE Conference on Computer Aided Control System Design, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, 2006 2006
DOI: 10.1109/cacsd-cca-isic.2006.4776762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive estimation of the road-tire friction coefficient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e tire-based response can be further divided into two methods of measuring the tire noise response [9] and measuring the tread deformation [10]. Both of these two methods do not get rid of the drawbacks of requiring additional sensors.…”
Section: Review Of Previous Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e tire-based response can be further divided into two methods of measuring the tire noise response [9] and measuring the tread deformation [10]. Both of these two methods do not get rid of the drawbacks of requiring additional sensors.…”
Section: Review Of Previous Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cause-based method, also known as the experimental method, uses sensors to measure friction-related parameters and attempts to correlate these parameters with the tire–road friction coefficient. The friction-related parameters are to use a sensor to measure anything from hub sound to road surface optical properties, and these sensors are acoustic [ 9 , 10 , 11 ], optical [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ], and tread sensors [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. Meanwhile, the effect-based method attempts to simplify the mathematical models to estimate friction [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vikki [ 13 ] used non-contact 3D field technology to obtain the macrotexture of the pavement, and the measuring results showed a positive correlation with tire–road friction. Holzmann [ 14 ] used cameras to take pictures of the current environment, extracted different μ-corresponding patterns based on the overall brightness, and matched these patterns with the current environment to derive the friction coefficient and confidence of the road ahead, while the microphone improved the reliability. Sohini [ 15 ] proposed a two-stage method for indirect tire–road friction coefficient estimation by using camera images.…”
Section: Measurement For Friction Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…be the domain of all possible values of (β, µ max ). 8 Pick a positive number T as the optimization horizon, whose role will soon be clear. What is particular about the problem in study is that the derivative of both unknown variables are either known or measurable.…”
Section: B Observer Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Andersson used optical sensors measuring infrared light at different wavelengths reflected from the road, such that different road surfaces (dry, wet, icy, snow surfaces) can be identified [7]. Holzmann applied cameras to classify road types by analyzing the texture of road images [8]. Similar studies are also shown in [9]- [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%