2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.04.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive equations versus measured energy expenditure by indirect calorimetry: A retrospective validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
74
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
74
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study found that the REE estimated by the Harris and Benedict formula [19] was signi cantly lower than that measured by IC. This nding corroborates the indication not to use this formula in critically ill patients and in patients with AKI [11,14,20,21] and the need to propose a new equation for those AKI on dialysis [21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Our study found that the REE estimated by the Harris and Benedict formula [19] was signi cantly lower than that measured by IC. This nding corroborates the indication not to use this formula in critically ill patients and in patients with AKI [11,14,20,21] and the need to propose a new equation for those AKI on dialysis [21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The weakness of predictive equations and the use of indirect calorimetry have been subject to multiple evaluations and recommendations from ESPEN [2] and ASPEN [41], both preferring the use of indirect calorimetry to evaluate ICU patient needs (rated a very weak recommendation by ASPEN). The predictive equations are associated with significant inaccuracy (up to 60%), leading to over or under evaluation of the needs and inducing over or underfeeding [118]. Numerous meta-analyses have demonstrated the poor value of predictive equations [119,120], variability that is increased because body weight remains a value difficult to accurately assess [121].…”
Section: Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caloric targeting in critically ill patients most often depends on predictive equations. However, a formula-based nutritional approach has no more value than flipping a coin and inevitably leads to under-or overestimation of calorie needs [10,11]. A worldwide audit in 10,000 patients from 880 ICUs showed poor adherence to nutrition guidelines.…”
Section: Caloriesmentioning
confidence: 99%