2003
DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2002.807140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive digital current programmed control

Abstract: This paper explores predictive digital current programmed control for valley, peak or average current. The control laws are derived for the three basic converters: buck, boost, and buck-boost. It is found that for each variable of interest (valley, peak or average current) there is a choice of the appropriate pulse-width modulation method to achieve predictive digital current control without oscillation problems. The proposed digital control techniques can be used in a range of power conversion applications, i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 488 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…3. The sampling of the average phase current is represented by the samplers, S. Given the symmetry of the converter waveforms in continuous conduction mode, the average phase current can be obtained by sampling once in the middle of the corresponding transistor conduction interval at any point of operation [9,12,13]. The phase-shifted operation of the phase-2 sampler with respect to the phase-1 sampler, S, is modelled by means of the time delay and advance units, e sT/2 and e -sT/2 according to the sampler decomposition method [9].…”
Section: B Small-signal Model Of the Converter With Digital Average mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. The sampling of the average phase current is represented by the samplers, S. Given the symmetry of the converter waveforms in continuous conduction mode, the average phase current can be obtained by sampling once in the middle of the corresponding transistor conduction interval at any point of operation [9,12,13]. The phase-shifted operation of the phase-2 sampler with respect to the phase-1 sampler, S, is modelled by means of the time delay and advance units, e sT/2 and e -sT/2 according to the sampler decomposition method [9].…”
Section: B Small-signal Model Of the Converter With Digital Average mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…peak current control [14], average current control with input voltage sensing [15] and without input voltage sensing [16,17], hysteresis control [18], one cycle control [19], nonlinear carrier control [20], fuzzy logic control [21], predictive control [22], duty ratio feedforward control [23], sliding mode control [24], R-S-T digital control [25], optimal control [26] and adaptive control [27]. For our networked VFD, average current control without input voltage sensing technique [17] has been chosen for robustness.…”
Section: A Boost Rectificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A digital predictive dead-beat control method is introduced to update the duty cycle through several switching cycles, instead of every switching cycle, so as to reduce the calculation burden [6], but the power factor of PFC converter is obviously decreased. The desired duty cycle for each switching cycle is updated via the values of previous duty cycle, input inductor current, input voltage and output voltage in [7], but the calculation error of the digital control loop is accumulated, and the accuracy of the duty cycle value is reduced. A direct duty cycle calculation algorithm is proposed in [8], to update the duty cycle in advance with low calculation requirement, but the regulation capability is not satisfactory under wide load variation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%