2007
DOI: 10.3182/20071017-3-br-2923.00067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive Control for Urban Traffic Networks: Initial Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As part of urban traffic simulation studies, urban traffic modeling is a common analytical approach to assess and optimize vehiclebased studies (Amadio et al, 2018), urban traffic flow (Ledoux, 1997), urban traffic control system (Boillot et al, 2006) or prediction (De Oliveira and Camponogara, 2007), mode choice behavior (Garcia-Aunon et al, 2019), urban traffic networks (Li et al, 2016), etc. Some studies also utilize combined modeling analyses, such as the development of a nexus between traffic flow and urban networks (Gartner and Stamatiadis, 2002), or mathematical methods (Wang et al, 2006), multi-agent methods (Ou et al, 2000), multi-objective methods (Tang and Wang, 2007), prediction methods (Nigarnjanagool and Dia, 2005), network-based studies (Schadschneider et al, 2005), integrated methods (Li and Zhao, 2008), etc.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of urban traffic simulation studies, urban traffic modeling is a common analytical approach to assess and optimize vehiclebased studies (Amadio et al, 2018), urban traffic flow (Ledoux, 1997), urban traffic control system (Boillot et al, 2006) or prediction (De Oliveira and Camponogara, 2007), mode choice behavior (Garcia-Aunon et al, 2019), urban traffic networks (Li et al, 2016), etc. Some studies also utilize combined modeling analyses, such as the development of a nexus between traffic flow and urban networks (Gartner and Stamatiadis, 2002), or mathematical methods (Wang et al, 2006), multi-agent methods (Ou et al, 2000), multi-objective methods (Tang and Wang, 2007), prediction methods (Nigarnjanagool and Dia, 2005), network-based studies (Schadschneider et al, 2005), integrated methods (Li and Zhao, 2008), etc.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the aim of contributing to the evolving technology of DMPC, this work presents computational and simulated analysis of the application of a DMPC framework to a representative urban traffic control (UTC) problem. The MPC formulation in is cast in this framework so that the advantages of scalability and tolerance to failure are brought to the solution. The UTC scenario is a simulated model of the downtown region of the city of Macaé , Brazil, considering a detailed description of the roadways, traffic flows, and other modeling parameters that closely reproduce actual traffic patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining it with control theory, the method called TUC (Vaya Dinopoulou et al, 2005) is formulated as a quadratic programming form, and the controller is designed in the classic LQR control law. In later works (Aboudolas et al, 2007;de Oliveira and Camponogara, 2007;K. Aboudolas et al, 2009;Lucas Barcelos de Oliveira et al, 2010;Zhou et al, 2012;Ye et al, 2013), the MPC approach was proposed, and demonstrated that the significant improvements may be induced by replacing the standard LQR control law with the finite moving horizon method such as model predictive control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%