2019
DOI: 10.1523/eneuro.0412-18.2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive Coding with Neural Transmission Delays: A Real-Time Temporal Alignment Hypothesis

Abstract: Visual Abstract

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
4
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This shows that successive neural representations that are ordinarily activated sequentially (i.e., on a diagonal in a temporal generalization matrix) are instead activated nearly concurrently, meaning that the corresponding brain areas may have become aligned in time. This would potentially allow the brain to function in close to real time, as has been proposed previously (5). However, a consequence of such a predictive architecture is that, when predicted events are not fulfilled, sensory information about what actually happened arrives too late to prevent the system from temporarily representing the predicted event.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This shows that successive neural representations that are ordinarily activated sequentially (i.e., on a diagonal in a temporal generalization matrix) are instead activated nearly concurrently, meaning that the corresponding brain areas may have become aligned in time. This would potentially allow the brain to function in close to real time, as has been proposed previously (5). However, a consequence of such a predictive architecture is that, when predicted events are not fulfilled, sensory information about what actually happened arrives too late to prevent the system from temporarily representing the predicted event.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 95%
“…One way the brain might compensate for neural delays is through prediction (3)(4)(5)(6). In support of this idea, predictable visual stimuli have been found to be represented in the visual system with a shorter latency than unpredictable stimuli in cats (7), macaques (8), and humans (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…At short inducer durations, the onset of the moving texture rapidly generates a motion signal in the early visual system ( Westheimer & McKee, 1977 ). This accompanies the early afferent position signal, forming a population code that represents both position and velocity, as proposed by previous theoretical ( Hogendoorn & Burkitt, 2019 ) and computational studies ( Khoei, Masson, & Perrinet, 2017 ; Kwon, Tadin, & Knill, 2015 ). These models predict that this visual motion signal causes a shift in the receptive fields of downstream neural populations in the direction opposite to the direction of motion – a prediction consistent with fMRI evidence ( Harvey & Dumoulin, 2016 ; Liu, Ashida, Smith, & Wandell, 2006 ; Maus, Fischer, & Whitney, 2013 ; Schneider et al, 2019 ; Whitney et al, 2003 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…FEF is considered the primary gaze center, providing top-down information to the afferent region PEF to coordinate visual attention ( 27 , 32 , 33 ). Our results may, therefore, impact on predictive coding models where given two distinct and hierarchical regions, impaired processing of the high-level one ( 34 ) leads to increased activity in the low-level one as a mechanism to optimize and “accumulate evidence.” Our multimodal pattern of putamen-PEF correlations adds a molecular correlate to such predictive coding models ( 35 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%