2016
DOI: 10.5582/bst.2016.01078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive biomarkers for targeted and cytotoxic agents in gastric cancer for personalized medicine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(76 reference statements)
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It negatively regulates intracellular levels of phosiphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate in cells and AKT/PKB signaling pathway, suppressing cellular functional activities [ 25 ]. Actually, emerging evidence has substantiated that PTEN could be targeted and regulated by miR-130a and miR-107 to influence cancerous cellular activities [ 26 , 27 ]. Nonetheless, there are fewer studies on the targeted relationships between miR-130a/miR-107 and PTEN in GC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It negatively regulates intracellular levels of phosiphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate in cells and AKT/PKB signaling pathway, suppressing cellular functional activities [ 25 ]. Actually, emerging evidence has substantiated that PTEN could be targeted and regulated by miR-130a and miR-107 to influence cancerous cellular activities [ 26 , 27 ]. Nonetheless, there are fewer studies on the targeted relationships between miR-130a/miR-107 and PTEN in GC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the GC patients are diagnosed in an advanced stage and the survival rates of them are relatively low, therefore, promising prognostic biomarkers that enable to identify the patients who could obviously benefit from chemotherapy and predict survival of them are crucial [ 14 , 15 ]. In this study, we found that evaluated FPR was significantly associated with T3-4 invasion, node metastasis and larger tumor size and was superior to other biomarkers to independently predict poor survival both within stage II-III, II and III subgroups; moreover, clinical outcome of III stage patients with low FPR appeared to obviously benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in comparison with high FPR stage III patients, and the biomarker could improve the predicted efficacy of nomogram for stage II-III GC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expression status of USP20 and Claspin was scored using a 4-point scale (0–4) based on the amount of positive cells and intensity of the staining under 5 random high-power fields. Score for percentage: <5% (0), 5–25% (1), 25–50% (2), 50–75% (3) and >75% (4); for intensity: no staining (0), light brown (1), brown (2) and dark brown (3). The final score of each specimen was calculated by multiplying staining intensity score with score of stained cells, score of ≤2, 3–4, 6–8 and 9–12 were defined as negative (−), weak (+), moderate (++) and strong (+++), respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radical gastrectomy offers the best opportunity for curative therapy, while most patients are diagnosed as advanced and unresectable GC thus losing the opportunity for surgery. For these patients, the efficacy of chemotherapy or radiotherapy even with targeted therapy are still limited (3). To break through the bottleneck of treatment, investigating the molecular mechanism of GC initiation and progression are urgently needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%