1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf00288824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive and postdictive success of statistical analyses of yield trials

Abstract: The accuracy of a yield trial can be increased by improved experimental techniques, more replicates, or more efficient statistical analyses. The third option involves nominal fixed costs, and is therefore very attractive. The statistical analysis recommended here combines the Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model with a predictive assessment of accuracy. AMMI begins with the usual analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compute genotype and environment additive effects. It then applies prin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
254
0
12

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 351 publications
(271 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
254
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The postdictive evaluation using the (Gollob, 1968) F-test the four interaction principal components were significant (p#0.01). The result was in agreement with Sivapalan et al (2000) recommended an AMMI model with the first four IPCAs predicates well the genotype by location interaction and the result was not consistent with Gauch and Zobel (1988) the two interaction principal component predictive while the reaming contributed to noise and Yan and Kang (2002) stated that most of the interaction occurs in the first few axes. The malt barley genotypes were predicted by the four interaction principal components while the rest of the interaction principal component might be attributed to the noise.…”
Section: Additive Main Effect and Multiplicative Interaction Analysissupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The postdictive evaluation using the (Gollob, 1968) F-test the four interaction principal components were significant (p#0.01). The result was in agreement with Sivapalan et al (2000) recommended an AMMI model with the first four IPCAs predicates well the genotype by location interaction and the result was not consistent with Gauch and Zobel (1988) the two interaction principal component predictive while the reaming contributed to noise and Yan and Kang (2002) stated that most of the interaction occurs in the first few axes. The malt barley genotypes were predicted by the four interaction principal components while the rest of the interaction principal component might be attributed to the noise.…”
Section: Additive Main Effect and Multiplicative Interaction Analysissupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Na definição do número de eixos principais a serem retidos para explicar e representar graficamente o padrão relacionado à interação GxE, adotaram-se critérios utilizados por Gauch & Zobel (1988), tendose levado em consideração a proporção da soma de Tabela 1. Identificação das linhagens de soja avaliadas (F 6 e F 7 ), com as respectivas genealogias.…”
Section: Methodsunclassified
“…Compreendeu três tipos de populações, obtidas de um dialelo parcial 4 x 4 envolvendo quatro genitores (IAC-100, Crockett, Lamar e D72-9601-1) resistentes a insetos e quatro cultivares adaptadas (BR-6, IAS-5, Davis, OCEPAR-4) com alta produtividade de grãos e precocidade (PINHEIRO, 1998 As análises de estabilidade e adaptabilidade fenotípica foram realizadas pelo método AMMI (ZOBEL et al 1988) por meio dos procedimentos GLM e IML do SAS e programa descrito por DUARTE e VENCOVSKY (1999). A técnica combinou método univariado (análise de variância) para componentes principais e trata a interação multiplicativa desses fatores com base na análise multivariada por componentes principais e decomposição por valores singulares.…”
Section: Methodsunclassified