2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2006.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive abilities of numerical sediment quality guidelines in Sydney Harbour, Australia, and vicinity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SQGs have been derived with a variety of both theoretical methods that rely upon equilibrium partitioning models and empirical methods that rely upon analyses of matching, field-collected chemistry, and biological effects data (McCready et al 2006). Examples of this include the effects range-low (ERL), effects-range median (ERM), threshold effects level (TEL), and probable effects level (PEL) ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SQGs have been derived with a variety of both theoretical methods that rely upon equilibrium partitioning models and empirical methods that rely upon analyses of matching, field-collected chemistry, and biological effects data (McCready et al 2006). Examples of this include the effects range-low (ERL), effects-range median (ERM), threshold effects level (TEL), and probable effects level (PEL) ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Invariably, sample sizes decreased as the degree of chemical contamination increased. In contrast, the results of a study designed specifically to test predictive abilities of SQGs was reported for Sydney Harbor, Australia (McCready et al 2006). Analyses of tests of 106 samples showed that the incidence of toxicity in laboratory tests was very low in samples with mERMq less than 0.1 (i.e., 0% with amphipods alone and 11% in any 1 of 4 tests).…”
Section: Comparisons With Previous Evaluations Of Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exhaustive review by Long et al (2006), in addition to providing an overview of the method and its principal advantages, assumptions, and limitations, uses several marine case studies to highlight the concentration-response relationships derived by the mSQG method. Several studies have compiled and analyzed considerable amounts of data, reporting that both the incidence and magnitude of toxicity in laboratory tests or benthic community impairments, or both, generally increase incrementally as mSQGq values increase Fairey et al 2001;Ingersoll et al 2005;Word et al 2005;Long et al 2006;McCready et al 2006). When comparing the incidence of toxicity over ranges of mSQGq values, evaluation of several data sets showed that the incidence of effects in acute laboratory tests was generally low (i.e., 10% or less) in sediments with mSQG values less than 0.1, increased to about 50% as mSQGq values increased to 1.0 or greater, and was greater than 75% when mSQGq values were greater than 1.5.…”
Section: Recent Approaches Of Sqgsmentioning
confidence: 99%