Predictions of summertime overheating: Comparison of dynamic thermal models and measurements in synthetically occupied test houses

Abstract

Summertime overheating in UK dwellings is seen as a risk to occupants' health and well-being. Dynamic thermal simulation programs are widely used to assess the overheating risk in new homes, but how accurate are the predictions? Results from two different dynamic thermal simulation programs used by four different experienced modellers are compared with measurements from a pair of traditional, semi-detached test houses. The synthetic occupancy in the test houses replicated curtain operation and the CIBSE TM59 internal heat gain profiles and internal door opening profiles. In one house, the windows were always closed and in the other they operated following the TM59 protocol. Sensors monitored the internal temperatures in five rooms and the local weather during a 21-day period in the summer of 2017. Model evaluation took place in two phases: blind and open. In the blind phase, modellers received information about the houses, the occupancy profiles and the weather conditions. In the open phase, modellers received the test house temperature measurements and, with the other modellers, adjusted their models to try and improve predictions. The data provided to modellers is openly available as supplementary information to this paper. In both phases, during warm weather, the models consistently predicted higher peak temperatures and larger diurnal swings than were measured. The models' predicted hours of overheating were compared with the measured hours using the CIBSE static threshold of 26℃ for bedrooms and the BSEN15251 Category II threshold for living rooms. The models developed in each phase were also used to predict the annual hours of overheating using the CIBSE TM59 procedure. The inter-model variation was quantified as the Simulation Resolution. For these houses, the blind phase models produced Simulation Resolution values of approximately 3% ± 3 percentage points for TM59 Criterion A and 1% ± 1 percentage point for TM59 Criterion B. The Simulation Resolution concept offers a valuable aid to modellers when assessing the compliance of dwellings with the TM59 overheating criteria. Further work to produce Simulation Resolution values for different dwelling archetypes and weather conditions is recommended. Practical application: Overheating in UK homes is a serious and growing risk to health and well-being. Dynamic thermal models are used to predict overheating risk in existing and proposed dwellings. Comparisons between predicted temperatures and temperatures measured in two test houses shed light on the accuracy of predictions for existing homes. CIBSE Technical Memorandum TM59 provides a strategy for predicting overheating risk in proposed dwellings. There are, however, differences between models' predictions. The concept of Simulation Resolution is introduced to quantify this inter-model variability. It provides modellers with a firm basis on which to determine whether TM59 overheating predictions are robust.

Which Building Services Are Considered to Have Impact on Climate Change?

“…The third cluster, in blue, links "building services", "energy conservation", and "office buildings", with "building codes", "climate control", and "lighting". The use of the Passivhaus [48] and NZEB standards [49] have proved to be effective in improving the building's energy efficiency, but it has also increased the overheating risk [50][51][52]. Therefore, the fourth cluster, in yellow, groups "building", "energy management", and "heating" with "thermal comfort", "building performance", and "overheating".…”

Evaluating methods for estimating whole house air infiltration rates in summer: implications for overheating and indoor air quality

“…For modelling applications, there is always a trade-off between data requirements, ease of use, and computation time (Jones et al , 2015). And because “infiltration is often input to the model and forgotten about” (Roberts et al , 2019a), more guidance is needed to help modellers in their decision making when estimating infiltration.…”

“…Yet, infiltration rates in summer cannot be ignored. Summertime overheating is an increasing problem in the UK and elsewhere, partly due to climate change, but also because homes are becoming more airtight (Lomas and Porritt, 2017) and infiltration is a modifier of indoor temperatures (Mavrogianni et al , 2012; Taylor et al , 2018; Roberts et al , 2019a).…”

Maxmaladaptation, occupant behaviour and energy performance gap

“…13 Added to which the "rebound effect" (where occupants of low energy dwellings use more energy than predicted) or a "prebound effect", where occupants of refurbished dwellings use less energy than predicted further complicates matters. Using a comparison of dynamic thermal models and measurements in "synthetically" occupied test houses gave small performance gaps 14 showing that the basic physics of the thermal models was sound. Although the basic physics of simulation is sound, Imam et al 15 suggest that a contribution to the energy gap could be due to poor use of the software by designers.…”