2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2006.06.083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictions of striking energy and angular dependence in pp(pp)S-waveπ0

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an M1 transition is forbidden in the diproton case [1] but the strength could come from a P-wave N configuration, which requires extra energy in order to overcome the centrifugal barrier. Similar arguments have been used to explain why the peak is shifted to higher energy also for the pp → {pp} s π 0 reaction [28]. In addition to the displacement of the pp → {pp} s γ peak position to higher energies, it is narrowed significantly compared to pn → dγ .…”
Section: T P (Mevmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Such an M1 transition is forbidden in the diproton case [1] but the strength could come from a P-wave N configuration, which requires extra energy in order to overcome the centrifugal barrier. Similar arguments have been used to explain why the peak is shifted to higher energy also for the pp → {pp} s π 0 reaction [28]. In addition to the displacement of the pp → {pp} s γ peak position to higher energies, it is narrowed significantly compared to pn → dγ .…”
Section: T P (Mevmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Analysis of reaction (2) in the frame of the three-amplitude approach was performed earlier in Ref. [45]. That calculation also used the amplitudes with the angular momenta of the initial proton pair L 3 and of the pion wave l < 4, but the relative values of the amplitudes found there in the coupledchannels approach [46] substantially differ from ours.…”
Section: Phenomenological Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%