2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10948-010-1006-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictions of Multiband s± Strong-Coupling Eliashberg Theory Compared to Experimental Data in Iron Pnictides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The imaginary-axis equations 5355 read: where and are the scattering rates from non-magnetic and magnetic impurities, respectively, and whereΘ is the Heaviside function and ω c is a cutoff energy. The quantities are the elements of the 3 × 3 Coulomb pseudopotential matrix.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The imaginary-axis equations 5355 read: where and are the scattering rates from non-magnetic and magnetic impurities, respectively, and whereΘ is the Heaviside function and ω c is a cutoff energy. The quantities are the elements of the 3 × 3 Coulomb pseudopotential matrix.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same can be done for the scattering rate from magnetic impurities: Γ M ij = 0. At least as a starting point, let us make further assumptions that have been shown to be valid for iron pnictides [33,37,38]. Following ref.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the case of pnictide superconductors, they can be interpreted within a three-band Eliashberg model. 33 For even higher voltages there is a parabolic decreasing background, which can be explained by Joule heating of the junction. fig.…”
Section: A Josephson Junctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%