The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1121/1.4944949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictions of middle-ear and passive cochlear mechanics using a finite element model of the pediatric ear

Abstract: A finite element (FE) model was developed based on histological sections of a temporal bone of a 4-year-old child to simulate middle-ear and cochlear function in ears with normal hearing and otitis media. This pediatric model of the normal ear, consisting of an ear canal, middle ear, and spiral cochlea, was first validated with published energy absorbance (EA) measurements in young children with normal ears. The model was used to simulate EA in an ear with middle-ear effusion, whose results were compared to cl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stinson et al 1982;Stinson 1985a, b;Gilman and Dirks 1986;Stinson and Khanna 1989;Bergevin and Olson 2014;Khaleghi and Puria 2017). Wang et al (2016) simulated the effects of the compliant canal on the energy absorbance response, but they did not report the pressure distribution within the canal and middleear cavity. Since the ear canal is longer in adults (~25 mm (Anson and Donaldson 1992, p. 146)) than in newborns (~16 mm from the entrance to the umbo, in our model), the onset of standing waves happens at lower frequencies in adult canals.…”
Section: Pressure Distribution Inside the Canal And Middle-ear Cavitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stinson et al 1982;Stinson 1985a, b;Gilman and Dirks 1986;Stinson and Khanna 1989;Bergevin and Olson 2014;Khaleghi and Puria 2017). Wang et al (2016) simulated the effects of the compliant canal on the energy absorbance response, but they did not report the pressure distribution within the canal and middleear cavity. Since the ear canal is longer in adults (~25 mm (Anson and Donaldson 1992, p. 146)) than in newborns (~16 mm from the entrance to the umbo, in our model), the onset of standing waves happens at lower frequencies in adult canals.…”
Section: Pressure Distribution Inside the Canal And Middle-ear Cavitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The changes are the greatest in the low-frequency region, where middle ear impedance is dominated by stiffness [ 4 ]. Effects of otosclerosis can be understood by examining electric equivalent circuit models of the middle ear [ 5 ] or finite-element models [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]. Traditional low-frequency tympanometry can sometimes reveal changes in middle ear admittance due to otosclerosis (e.g., a decrease in static compliance), but in a significant percentage of cases the compliance of otosclerotic ears remains normal [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sound transmission through the middle ear undergoes developmental changes throughout infancy (Hunter et al, 2015; Keefe and Levi, 1996; Keefe et al, 1993; Sanford and Feeney, 2008; Werner et al, 2010) and continues into childhood (Beers et al, 2010; Hunter et al, 2008; Okabe et al., 1988; Wang et al, 2016). Maturation of the middle ear transmission has important implications for perceptual and physiologic studies of auditory development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%