Abstract:A finite element (FE) model was developed based on histological sections of a temporal bone of a 4-year-old child to simulate middle-ear and cochlear function in ears with normal hearing and otitis media. This pediatric model of the normal ear, consisting of an ear canal, middle ear, and spiral cochlea, was first validated with published energy absorbance (EA) measurements in young children with normal ears. The model was used to simulate EA in an ear with middle-ear effusion, whose results were compared to cl… Show more
“…Stinson et al 1982;Stinson 1985a, b;Gilman and Dirks 1986;Stinson and Khanna 1989;Bergevin and Olson 2014;Khaleghi and Puria 2017). Wang et al (2016) simulated the effects of the compliant canal on the energy absorbance response, but they did not report the pressure distribution within the canal and middleear cavity. Since the ear canal is longer in adults (~25 mm (Anson and Donaldson 1992, p. 146)) than in newborns (~16 mm from the entrance to the umbo, in our model), the onset of standing waves happens at lower frequencies in adult canals.…”
Section: Pressure Distribution Inside the Canal And Middle-ear Cavitymentioning
The anatomical differences between the newborn ear and the adult one result in different input admittance responses in newborns than those in adults. Taking into account fluid-structure interactions, we have developed a finite-element model to investigate the wideband admittance responses of the ear canal and middle ear in newborns for frequencies up to 10 kHz. We have also performed admittance measurements on a group of 23 infants with ages between 14 and 28 days, for frequencies from 250 to 8000 Hz with 1/12-octave resolution. Sensitivity analyses of the model were performed to investigate the contributions of the ear canal and middle ear to the overall admittance responses, as well as the effects of the material parameters, measurement location and geometrical variability. The model was validated by comparison with our new data and with data from the literature. The model provides a quantitative understanding of the canal and middle-ear resonances around 500 and 1800 Hz, respectively, and also predicts the effects of the first resonance mode of the middle-ear cavity (around 6 kHz) as well as the first and second standing-wave modes in the ear canal (around 7.2 and 9.6 kHz, respectively), which may explain features seen in our high-frequency-resolution clinical measurements.
“…Stinson et al 1982;Stinson 1985a, b;Gilman and Dirks 1986;Stinson and Khanna 1989;Bergevin and Olson 2014;Khaleghi and Puria 2017). Wang et al (2016) simulated the effects of the compliant canal on the energy absorbance response, but they did not report the pressure distribution within the canal and middleear cavity. Since the ear canal is longer in adults (~25 mm (Anson and Donaldson 1992, p. 146)) than in newborns (~16 mm from the entrance to the umbo, in our model), the onset of standing waves happens at lower frequencies in adult canals.…”
Section: Pressure Distribution Inside the Canal And Middle-ear Cavitymentioning
The anatomical differences between the newborn ear and the adult one result in different input admittance responses in newborns than those in adults. Taking into account fluid-structure interactions, we have developed a finite-element model to investigate the wideband admittance responses of the ear canal and middle ear in newborns for frequencies up to 10 kHz. We have also performed admittance measurements on a group of 23 infants with ages between 14 and 28 days, for frequencies from 250 to 8000 Hz with 1/12-octave resolution. Sensitivity analyses of the model were performed to investigate the contributions of the ear canal and middle ear to the overall admittance responses, as well as the effects of the material parameters, measurement location and geometrical variability. The model was validated by comparison with our new data and with data from the literature. The model provides a quantitative understanding of the canal and middle-ear resonances around 500 and 1800 Hz, respectively, and also predicts the effects of the first resonance mode of the middle-ear cavity (around 6 kHz) as well as the first and second standing-wave modes in the ear canal (around 7.2 and 9.6 kHz, respectively), which may explain features seen in our high-frequency-resolution clinical measurements.
“…The changes are the greatest in the low-frequency region, where middle ear impedance is dominated by stiffness [ 4 ]. Effects of otosclerosis can be understood by examining electric equivalent circuit models of the middle ear [ 5 ] or finite-element models [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]. Traditional low-frequency tympanometry can sometimes reveal changes in middle ear admittance due to otosclerosis (e.g., a decrease in static compliance), but in a significant percentage of cases the compliance of otosclerotic ears remains normal [ 9 ].…”
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of wideband energy absorbance in diagnosing otosclerosis by comparing the differences in acoustic absorbance between otosclerotic and normal ears. Exactly 90 surgically confirmed otosclerotic ears were included in the test group. The control group consisted of 126 matched normal-hearing subjects. The Titan hearing test platform (Interacoustics) was used for absorbance and acoustic immittance tests. Energy absorbance, measured at tympanometric peak pressure, was analyzed in the range 226–8000 Hz. Differences between normal and otosclerotic ears were analyzed in quarter-octave bands. Wideband absorbance, i.e., absorbance averaged over the 226–2000 Hz band, and resonance frequency were calculated and compared between normal and otosclerotic ears. Significant differences between the absorbance of normal and otosclerotic ears were found, especially at low and middle frequencies. No significant effect of ear side or gender was observed. For average wideband absorbance and resonance frequency, less pronounced (although significant) differences were found between normal and otosclerotic ears. Measurement of peak-pressure energy absorbance, averaged over a frequency band around 650 Hz, provides a valid criterion in testing for otosclerosis. The test is highly effective, with a sensitivity and specificity of over 85% and area under receiver operating characteristic curve above 0.9. Average wideband absorbance can also be used, but its effectiveness is lower. Other immittance-related measures are considerably less effective.
“…Sound transmission through the middle ear
undergoes developmental changes throughout infancy (Hunter et al, 2015; Keefe and Levi,
1996; Keefe et al, 1993; Sanford and Feeney, 2008; Werner et al, 2010) and continues into childhood (Beers et al, 2010; Hunter et al, 2008; Okabe et
al., 1988; Wang et al, 2016). Maturation of the middle ear transmission has important implications for perceptual
and physiologic studies of auditory development.…”
The goal of the current study was to characterize the normative features
of wideband acoustic immittance in children for describing the functional
maturation of the middle ear in 5 to 12-year-old children. Absorbance and group
delay were measured in adults and three groups of children, 5–6,
7–9 and 10–12-year-olds, in a cross-sectional design. Absorbance
showed significant effects of the age group in four out of ten center
frequencies of one-half-octave bins from 211 to 6000 Hz, while there was no
significant effect for group delay at any frequency. Older children
(10–12 years) showed absorbance similar to adults. Test-retest
reliability was high for absorbance for all age groups. However, group delay was
modestly reliable only for adults. We conclude that the middle ear transmission
follows a protracted period of maturation for high frequencies and reaches
adult-like feature by 10 to 12 years of age.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.