1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(98)00830-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictions of forming limit diagrams using crystal plasticity models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[4] The addition of revised plasticity and kinematic hardening models and the results from studies of the influence of various material parameters (such as grain size and grain orientation effects, surface roughening effects, and other damage mechanisms) on strain localization have enhanced the reliability of the numerical models. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Despite the significant improvements that have been made to these models, inconsistencies still exist between the mechanical behavior that is predicted and the behavior that is observed experimentally. One possible source for these discrepancies is that the models used to predict the mechanical behavior are fundamentally deterministic and they simply cannot account for all of the variability that is possible in every microstructural component involved in the plastic deformation process of a polycrystalline material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4] The addition of revised plasticity and kinematic hardening models and the results from studies of the influence of various material parameters (such as grain size and grain orientation effects, surface roughening effects, and other damage mechanisms) on strain localization have enhanced the reliability of the numerical models. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Despite the significant improvements that have been made to these models, inconsistencies still exist between the mechanical behavior that is predicted and the behavior that is observed experimentally. One possible source for these discrepancies is that the models used to predict the mechanical behavior are fundamentally deterministic and they simply cannot account for all of the variability that is possible in every microstructural component involved in the plastic deformation process of a polycrystalline material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several attempts have been made in the past where comprehensive studies have been conducted in which the influence of crystal anisotropy, texture, dislocation structure and microstructure on the forming limit diagrams (FLDs) and strain paths (Nakazima et al 1968;Kikuma and Nakazima 1971;Toth et al 1988;Wu et al 1997;Hiwatashi 1998;Savoie et al 1998;Hashiguchi and Protasov 2004;Eyckens et al 2009). Simulations are carried out iteratively to evaluate the limit strains as per the following procedure.…”
Section: Simulation For Determination Of Limit Strainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the M-K model many other references can be found in the literature (see e.g. Arrieux, 1995;Banabic and Dannemann, 2001;Banabic et al, 2005b;Butuc et al, 2003;Barlat, 1987;Chakrabarty et al, 1999;Friedman and Pan, 2000;Kuroda and Tvergaard, 2000;Lian and Zhou, 1989;Tadros and Mellor, 1975;Tvergaard, 1978;Rasmussen, 1982;Barata da Rocha et al, 1984-1985Savoie et al, 1998;Vacher et al, 1998;Wu et al, 2003;Zhao et al, 1996).…”
Section: Localized Necking Model According To Marciniak and Kuczyń Skimentioning
confidence: 99%