2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.03.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictions of effective diffusivity of mixed matrix membranes with tubular fillers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…D eff was shown to monotonically increase with the filler volume fraction (Φ f ) and diffusivity of the filler (D f ). This trend is similar to that reported for MMMs with spherical and/or tubular fillers [50,60,61]. In simulations where D f,out /D m was fixed at 10 2 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…D eff was shown to monotonically increase with the filler volume fraction (Φ f ) and diffusivity of the filler (D f ). This trend is similar to that reported for MMMs with spherical and/or tubular fillers [50,60,61]. In simulations where D f,out /D m was fixed at 10 2 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…For example, significant disagreements have been observed between experiment measurements and the predictions of D eff by the Cussler model when dealing with MMMs comprising cellulose acetate as a matrix and AMH-3 as a filler [54]. Numerical methods based on mass transport simulations have been developed to address this issue [55][56][57][58][59][60][61]. In the case of MMMs with layered fillers, numerical methods have been developed to investigate the effects of aspect ratio [58], filler shape (e.g., circular, square, hexagonal) [59], and filler orientation [55][56][57] on the D eff of MMMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SMA offers several benefits in comparison to earlier RMA and EMA approaches, amongst which the main advantage is that this approach can easily incorporate the permeability dependence on the concentration field [153] and finite-system size effects [151], largely disregarded in the former approaches. In this way, the SMA can accommodate effects on the permeability of intrinsic system properties such filler particle size [151] and shape [171,172], isotherm nonlinearity [153], and membrane geometry [152,169]. These effects are empirically treated in most RMA/EMA models [20], such in the Ebneyamini [68], Higuchi [88], and Pal [65] models.…”
Section: Simulation-based Rigorous Modeling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although much effort has been devoted to the improvement of EMT models, their limitations have prompted researchers to explore more accurate approaches such as the detailed simulation of MMMs [15,[55][56][57], in which the coupled 3d transport equations for the transport in the filler particles and in the surrounding polymer matrix are simultaneously solved using the finite element method (FEM). Such detailed 3d simulation overcomes limitations of EMT models in the estimation of the effective permeability, particularly the effect of particle size and the interfacial adsorption equilibrium [5].…”
Section: ✗ ✓ ✓mentioning
confidence: 99%