2006
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.73.045102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictions of bond percolation thresholds for the kagomé and Archimedean(3,122)lattices

Abstract: Here we show how the recent exact determination of the bond percolation threshold for the martini lattice can be used to provide approximations to the unsolved kagomé and (3, 122 ) lattices. We present two different methods, one of which provides an approximation to the inhomogeneous kagomé and (3, 122 ) bond problems, and the other gives estimates of pc for the homogeneous kagomé (0.5244088...) and (3,12 2 ) (0.7404212...) problems that respectively agree with numerical results to five and six significant fig… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
109
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(59 reference statements)
9
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, it is still believed to be false; see Ziff and Suding [46], for example. More recently, Scullard and Ziff [28] have predicted certain values for p b c for the Kagomé and (3, 12 2 ) lattices, using a heuristic version of the star-triangle transformation. Although they leave open the 'possibility' that one of these values might be exact, there seems no reason (to us, or, apparently, to them) to really believe this: the method is (as they admit) non-rigorous, and the value obtained in the same way for the Kagomé lattice (given earlier by Hori and Kitahara without derivation) is outside the error bounds of existing experimental results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it is still believed to be false; see Ziff and Suding [46], for example. More recently, Scullard and Ziff [28] have predicted certain values for p b c for the Kagomé and (3, 12 2 ) lattices, using a heuristic version of the star-triangle transformation. Although they leave open the 'possibility' that one of these values might be exact, there seems no reason (to us, or, apparently, to them) to really believe this: the method is (as they admit) non-rigorous, and the value obtained in the same way for the Kagomé lattice (given earlier by Hori and Kitahara without derivation) is outside the error bounds of existing experimental results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solution on the triangular lattice can be extended by decoration [8,9,10] and to the closely related bowtie lattices [11,12,13]. The critical manifold-which is the set of points in (q, v) space at which the model stands at a phase transition-is obviously of special interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, choosing a simple triangle with uncorrelated bonds in Figure 2(a), gives the kagomé lattice. This lattice's bond threshold cannot be found by the following method and, in fact, the problem remains unsolved [18].…”
Section: Triangle-triangle Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in a critical surface rather than a critical point and application of (7) implies that it is given by [17,18] Table 1. Bond percolation thresholds of the lattices in Fig.…”
Section: Martini and Related Latticesmentioning
confidence: 99%