2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00429-012-0475-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictions not commands: active inference in the motor system

Abstract: The descending projections from motor cortex share many features with top-down or backward connections in visual cortex; for example, corticospinal projections originate in infragranular layers, are highly divergent and (along with descending cortico-cortical projections) target cells expressing NMDA receptors. This is somewhat paradoxical because backward modulatory characteristics would not be expected of driving motor command signals. We resolve this apparent paradox using a functional characterisation of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
590
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 638 publications
(612 citation statements)
references
References 235 publications
(299 reference statements)
21
590
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note, however, that corticomuscular coherence was maximal at 9 Hz and hence di↵ers from typical alpha activity but may be related to the 'mu' rhythm (Pfurtscheller and Lopes Da Silva, 1999). Current motor control theories suggest that an internal model is used in trajectory planning to predict the sensory consequences of motor commands, which is updated through sensory prediction errors (Kawato, 1999;Wolpert and Ghahramani, 2000;Shadmehr et al, 2010;Friston, 2010;Adams et al, 2013). Error correction and adaption is then only required when there is a mismatch between the observed sensory signals and those predicted by the model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note, however, that corticomuscular coherence was maximal at 9 Hz and hence di↵ers from typical alpha activity but may be related to the 'mu' rhythm (Pfurtscheller and Lopes Da Silva, 1999). Current motor control theories suggest that an internal model is used in trajectory planning to predict the sensory consequences of motor commands, which is updated through sensory prediction errors (Kawato, 1999;Wolpert and Ghahramani, 2000;Shadmehr et al, 2010;Friston, 2010;Adams et al, 2013). Error correction and adaption is then only required when there is a mismatch between the observed sensory signals and those predicted by the model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results can also be interpreted using an active inference framework (20). Here, intentions are abstract predictions about likely outcomes, which are Bayes-optimally combined with sensory evidence about outcomes when this becomes available.…”
Section: Exp 1: Involuntary Movementmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Note that action is prescribed by predictions of the next outcome and is not itself part of the inference process. This separation of action and perceptual inference or state estimation can be understood by associating action with peripheral reflexes in the motor system that fulfill top-down motor predictions about how we move (Feldman, 2009;Adams, Shipp, & Friston, 2013).…”
Section: Active Inference and Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%