The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1007/jhep07(2016)148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictions for diphoton production at the LHC through NNLO in QCD

Abstract: In this paper we present a next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) calculation of the process pp → γγ that we have implemented into the parton level Monte Carlo code MCFM. We do not find agreement with the previous calculation of this process in the literature. In addition to the O(α 2 s ) corrections present at NNLO, we include some effects arising at O(α 3 s ), namely those associated with gluon-initiated closed fermion loops. We investigate the role of this process in the context of studies of QCD at colliders… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
152
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
5
152
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both ATLAS (Aad et al, 2012b(Aad et al, , 2013c and CMS (Chatrchyan et al, 2012a(Chatrchyan et al, , 2014a have studied diphoton production at 7 TeV in data samples with integrated luminosities of up to 5 fb −1 . The measured total cross sections are clearly most compatible with the theoretical predictions at NNLO, and partial N 3 LO results including the NLO corrections to the gluon-gluon channel box diagram lead to a further 7% increase of the total cross section prediction (Campbell et al, 2016).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both ATLAS (Aad et al, 2012b(Aad et al, , 2013c and CMS (Chatrchyan et al, 2012a(Chatrchyan et al, , 2014a have studied diphoton production at 7 TeV in data samples with integrated luminosities of up to 5 fb −1 . The measured total cross sections are clearly most compatible with the theoretical predictions at NNLO, and partial N 3 LO results including the NLO corrections to the gluon-gluon channel box diagram lead to a further 7% increase of the total cross section prediction (Campbell et al, 2016).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…For diboson production, the state of the art QCD calculation is NNLO for W + W − Grazzini et al, 2016a), W ± γ (Denner et al, 2015;Grazzini et al, 2015a), Grazzini et al, 2015a) and γγ (Campbell et al, 2016). There has been recent rapid progress on this front using q T subtraction techniques and in the near future public codes, such as MATRIX (Wiesemann et al, 2016), should be available to automate event generation.…”
Section: Diboson Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33]. Therein the results have been validated using the same procedure as we will adopt later; we do not repeat that analysis here.…”
Section: Associated Higgs Production: W ± H and Z H Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pp → H and pp → Z were also calculated using this method [4]. Additional processes of phenomenological interest, pp → V H [22] and pp → γ γ [33] have been calculated using the same approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the lack of a new electron-positron collider, few improvements have been made on photon FFs over the last decades [24,25]. NLO calculations for Zγ+jet and Zγγ [29] have recently become available in MCFM, followed by predictions at next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) for diphoton [26,27] and Zγ [28] production. The disadvantages of inclusive calculations lie in the limited multiplicity of and information on the produced final state and the consequently restricted number of kinematic observables.…”
Section: Jhep03(2018)081mentioning
confidence: 99%