2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.hydroa.2022.100138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictions and drivers of sub-reach-scale annual streamflow permanence for the upper Missouri River basin: 1989–2018

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many past studies depend on these databases to get and analyze Climate data (e.g. Rockett, P., 2021;Deshmane, M et al, 2020;Chandler, W et al, 2015;Zhang, T et al, 2010;Puri, P., Puri, V., 2022;Sando, R. et al, 2022;Marelign, M. A. et al, 2020). The current study used POWER to download temperature data °C, wind speed (km\h), and relative humidity (%) (https://power.larc.nasa.gov/data-accessviewer).…”
Section: 2-climatic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many past studies depend on these databases to get and analyze Climate data (e.g. Rockett, P., 2021;Deshmane, M et al, 2020;Chandler, W et al, 2015;Zhang, T et al, 2010;Puri, P., Puri, V., 2022;Sando, R. et al, 2022;Marelign, M. A. et al, 2020). The current study used POWER to download temperature data °C, wind speed (km\h), and relative humidity (%) (https://power.larc.nasa.gov/data-accessviewer).…”
Section: 2-climatic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probabilities are useful for identifying which parts of the channel network have the highest and lowest likelihood of late summer flow that correspond, in this case, to probability values well above and below 0.5, respectively. Similarly, it is useful to identify those parts of the channel network that have less likelihood of belonging to a definitive class (e.g., probability values surrounding 0.5), which either may require additional data collection to better determine the streamflow permanence class (Jaeger et al, 2019;Messager et al, 2021;Sando et al, 2022) or which may represent locations that are near the threshold between classes and which may be more sensitive to shifts between streamflow permanence classes from climate change (Ward et al, 2020;Zipper et al, 2021;Botter et al, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical models have shown promise for providing predictions on streamflow permanence, collectively defined here as both the spatial extent of surface flow and persistence of surface flow in terms of timing and duration of flow. Models have been produced across a range of spatial and temporal scales from global, one-time predictions (Messager et al, 2021), to multi-state regional, annual (Jaeger et al, 2019;Sando et al, 2022) or daily predictions (Yu et al, 2019), to individual watershed and reach scales at varying time steps (Durighetto et al, 2020;Jensen et al, 2018;Kaplan et al, 2020;Moidu et al, 2021;Pate et al, 2020). The strength of these models is the ability to leverage readily available spatial data to provide predictions of streamflow permanence based on typically sparse response variable data (Biau & Scornet, 2016), in this case streamflow-permanence observations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations