2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-021-05726-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction skill of Sahelian heatwaves out to subseasonal lead times and importance of atmospheric tropical modes of variability

Abstract: Global warming has increased the frequency of extreme weather events, including heatwaves, over recent decades. Heat early warning systems are being set up in many regions as a tool to mitigate their effects. Such systems are not yet implemented in the West African Sahel, partly because of insufficient knowledge on the skill of models to predict them. The present study addresses this gap by examining the skill of the ECMWF ENS extended-range forecasting system (ENS-ext) to predict Sahelian heatwaves out to sub… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Strategies include improvements in the signal‐to‐noise ratio through temporal and/or spatial data aggregation, or refined techniques to optimize the error losses or the limited sample size associated with extreme events (e.g., by using learning from less extreme events; Jacques‐Dumas et al., 2022; López‐Gómez et al., 2022; Vijverberg et al., 2020). ML methods have also been employed to discover subseasonal drivers of European high temperatures at different time leads (van Straaten et al., 2022), and windows of opportunity for enhanced subseasonal forecasts of HWs (Guigma et al., 2021). Overall, the uncovered linkages confirm the key role of well‐known drivers (tropical forcing and soil moisture) already revealed by dynamical forecasts, but also specific regional features in extratropical SSTs, sea ice and snow cover anomalies, which may vary with the region, timing and lag considered.…”
Section: Other Knowledge Gaps and Research Avenuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strategies include improvements in the signal‐to‐noise ratio through temporal and/or spatial data aggregation, or refined techniques to optimize the error losses or the limited sample size associated with extreme events (e.g., by using learning from less extreme events; Jacques‐Dumas et al., 2022; López‐Gómez et al., 2022; Vijverberg et al., 2020). ML methods have also been employed to discover subseasonal drivers of European high temperatures at different time leads (van Straaten et al., 2022), and windows of opportunity for enhanced subseasonal forecasts of HWs (Guigma et al., 2021). Overall, the uncovered linkages confirm the key role of well‐known drivers (tropical forcing and soil moisture) already revealed by dynamical forecasts, but also specific regional features in extratropical SSTs, sea ice and snow cover anomalies, which may vary with the region, timing and lag considered.…”
Section: Other Knowledge Gaps and Research Avenuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, the uncertainties of subseasonal HW predictions can not only be reduced by targeting observations to eliminate errors in key parameters but also by ensemble forecast systems. Most S2S models have been shown to notably underestimate the intensity of HWs (Guigma et al., 2021; Lin et al., 2022; Vitart et al., 2017; Wulff & Domeisen, 2019). Reportedly, the main physical processes are analogous in these S2S systems, although they have different land modules.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2018) discovered that the ECMWF model captured temperature anomalies 3 weeks in advance. Most authors agree that S2S models are capable of predicting extreme HWs 2–3 weeks in advance, but the intensity of HWs is always greatly underestimated (Ardilouze et al., 2017; Guigma et al., 2021; Lin et al., 2022; Marshall et al., 2014; Osman & Alvarez, 2018). In general, the subseasonal prediction of HWs still contains large uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As one approach, spectral decomposition is one common way to identify different spatial scales, where each spatial scale can be identified with a wavelength of a different spectral basis function, such as a sinusoid or a spherical harmonic. Spectral decompositions have long been used in analyzing predictability on different scales, e.g., [5,[12][13][14] and also have been used for various applications such as to identify predictability of different types of convectively coupled equatorial waves (CCEWs) [15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. As a second approach, one can use a regional spatial average to identify a particular spatial scale, using an approach as in Figure 1 but for space instead of time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%